‎Comptabilité‎

‎Trespeuch J.‎

‎Pour tenir sa comptabilité et vérifier ses impôts à l'usage des commerçants et des artisans - 3e édition‎

‎Dunod. 1937. In-12. Broché. Etat d'usage, Couv. légèrement passée, Dos satisfaisant, Papier jauni. VIII + 153 pages. Page de titre très légèrement déchirée sans conséquence sur le texte.. . . . Classification Dewey : 657-Comptabilité‎

‎Classification Dewey : 657-Comptabilité‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : R240159705

‎Triquère Claude‎

‎B.A.-BA de comptabilité: pour tous les gestionnaires débutants‎

‎STUDYRAMA 2015 313 pages 13 8x2x19 8cm. 2015. Broché. 313 pages.‎

‎Bon état‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 500293631

‎TRIDON M.‎

‎COMPTABILITE USUELLE : LA COMPTABILITE DU PARTICULIER ET DU PETIT COMMERCANT - BIBLIOTHEQUE PRATIQUE DE L'AMATEUR.‎

‎J.-B. BAILLIERE ET FILS. 1931. In-12. Broché. Etat d'usage, Coins frottés, Dos frotté, Intérieur acceptable. 152 pages augmentées de quelques planches en noir et blanc.. . . . Classification Dewey : 657-Comptabilité‎

‎Classification Dewey : 657-Comptabilité‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : ROD0119630

‎TROTIGNON, Georges.‎

‎Manager et comptable. Deux fonctions, un seul langage.‎

‎Paris, Les Editions d’Organisation 1978, 240x155mm, 558pages, broché. Bel exemplaire.‎

‎Pour un paiement via PayPal, veuillez nous en faire la demande et nous vous enverrons une facture PayPal‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 95066

‎Tsoukalis Loukas‎

‎Political Economy of International Money: In Search of a New Order‎

‎Sage Publications Ltd 1985 320 pages 13 6x2x21 8cm. 1985. Broché. 320 pages.‎

‎Très bon état intérieur propre bonne tenue couverture un peu jaunie‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 100137578 ISBN : 803997116

‎TUILLET G.‎

‎L'ORGANISATION COMPTABLE - COLLECTION LA VIE D'ENTREPRISE‎

‎DUNOD. 1969. In-12. Broché. Bon état, Couv. convenable, Dos frotté, Quelques rousseurs. 118 pages - Une annotation à l'encre sur le 2e contreplat. . . . Classification Dewey : 657-Comptabilité‎

‎"Collection "" La vie de l'entreprise "" Classification Dewey : 657-Comptabilité"‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : R160199840

‎Twizell, E. H.‎

‎Computational Methods for Partial Differential Equations‎

‎Hardcover. No jacket. Ellis Horwood Series in Mathematics and Its Applications. Superficial marks on boards. Contents are sound, clean, clear, in very good condition. BW Used‎

‎UNE REUNION DE PROFESSEURS.‎

‎NOTIONS DE COMMERCE ET DE COMPTABILITE.‎

‎MAME. COLLECTION D OUVRAGES CLASSIQUES.. 1938. In-8. Cartonné. Etat d'usage, Couv. légèrement passée, Dos abîmé, Intérieur acceptable. 176 pages. Quelques notes au crayon de couleurs dans la marge du texte.. . . . Classification Dewey : 657-Comptabilité‎

‎Classification Dewey : 657-Comptabilité‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : R150158400

‎UNE REUNION DE PROFESSEURS.‎

‎NOTIONS DE COMMERCE ET DE COMPTABILITE.‎

‎MAME. COLLECTION D OUVRAGES CLASSIQUES.. 1938. In-8 Carré. Cartonné. Etat d'usage. Couv. légèrement passée. Dos abîmé. Intérieur acceptable. 176 pages. Quelques notes au crayon de couleurs dans la marge du texte.‎

‎United States General Accounting Office‎

‎Bureau of Reclamation: An Assessment of the Environmental Impact Statement on the Operations of the Glen Canyon Dam; October 1996 Classic Reprint‎

‎paperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 0365881821.G ISBN : 0365881821 9780365881827

‎United States; General Accounting Office‎

‎Bureau of Reclamation: Information on Allocation and Repayment of Costs of Constructing Water Projects; Report to the Ranking Minority Member . House of Representatives Classic Reprint‎

‎hardcover. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. hardcover‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 0656999578.G ISBN : 0656999578 9780656999576

‎United States General Accounting Office‎

‎Information Technology Investment Management; A Framework for Assessing and Improving Process Maturity Exposure Draft GAO/AIMD-10.1.23‎

‎Washington DC: United States General Accounting Office 2000. Version 1 Exposure Draft. Wraps. Very good. iv 163 1 pages. Footnotes. Figures. Abbreviations. Appendices including a Glossary. Document Distribution Center Customer Service Survey form laid in. Few draft copies survive. This was a precursor to a 2004 Executive Guide of the same title published as GAO-04-394G. An exposure draft was typically used to broadly solicit comments from multiple agencies and stakeholders. Otherwise audit and review drafts were typically shared with the studied agency for factual accuracy and to obtain a management response. In 1997 the GAO developed guidance based primarily on the Clinger-Cohen Act that provides a method for evaluating and assessing how well a federal agency is selecting and managing its IT resources and identifies specific areas where improvements can be made. The Information Technology Investment Management framework identifies critical processes for successful IT investment and organizing these processes into a framework of increasingly mature stages. This shift reflects both the maturation of the thinking in the area of IT investment management and the feedback we received from organizations based upon their experiences creating their IT investment mechanisms and processes. Such a maturity framework can be used to analyze an organization's IT investment management process and determine the maturity of its investment process. In doing so ITIM establishes three key benefits: 1 a rigorous standardized tool for internal and external evaluations of an agency's IT investment management process; 2 a consistent and understandable mechanism for reporting the results of these assessments to agency executives the Congress and other interested parties; and 3 a road map agencies can use for improving their IT investment management process. The achievement of more mature IT investment management stages depends on performing other good management practices and attributes such as human capital training IT architecture and software management. United States General Accounting Office paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 77137

‎United States General Accounting Office‎

‎National Missile Defense; Even With Increased Funding Technical and Schedule Risks Are High GAO/NSIAD-98-153‎

‎Washington DC: United States General Accounting Office 1998. Presumed First Edition First Printing. Wraps. Very good. 23 1 pages. Footnotes. Illustrations. Tabular data. This is a "Report to Congressional Requesters". This report responds to a Congressional request that the GAO review the National Missile Defense NMD program funding requirements and schedule and technical risks. Specifically you asked us to determine 1 why the Department of Defense DOD significantly increased the program's near-term funding in its May 1997 Quadrennial Defense Review 2 how funding increases authorized and appropriated by Congress for the program in fiscal years 1996 through 1998 have been used or are planned to be used and 3 DOD's planned level of future funding for the NMD program and planned uses for those funds. You also asked for an assessment of the program's current schedule and technical risks. We provided an initial assessment of the schedule and technical risks in our December 12 1997 report to you. This report updates that assessment. The primary mission of NMD is to defend the United States against an intercontinental ballistic missile attack consisting of several missiles launched from a rogue nation. It would also have some capability against an accidental launch from nuclear powers such as Russia or China. The United States has been developing technologies for use in an NMD system for a number of years. In April 1996 DOD changed the purpose of the NMD program from a technology readiness program to a deployment readiness program and designated NMD as a major defense acquisition program. Under the technology readiness program the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization BMDO developed and matured technologies for possible use in an NMD system. Under the current deployment readiness program BMDO plans to integrate the technologies into a system that can be made operational. The deployment readiness program is commonly known as the "33" program. The goal of the NMD 33 program is to develop and demonstrate by fiscal year 2000 an initial limited capability that could be deployed by fiscal year 2003. The deployment decision is to be based on ongoing assessments of the threat and will not be made until fiscal year 2000 at the earliest. If DOD concludes at that time that the threat does not warrant deployment by fiscal year 2003 development will continue. While BMDO is still determining the specific design of the initial NMD system its features will include 1 space- and ground-based sensors to provide early warning of attacking missiles; 2 ground-based radars to identify and track the threatening warheads; 3 ground-based interceptors to collide with and destroy incoming warheads; and 4 a battle management command control and communications system. United States General Accounting Office paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 91246

‎United States General Accounting Office‎

‎Nuclear Weapons Complex: Issues Surrounding Consolidating Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories; Statement of Victor S. Rezendes Director Energy and Science Issues Resources Community and Economic Development Division: Testimony Before the Committee on Science Space and Technology House of Representatives GAO/T-RCED-92-98‎

‎Washington DC: United States General Accounting Office 1992. Contemporary Xerox copies. Six individually stapled items held together by a binder clip. Good. 1 31 pages. Together with copies of the testimonies of John Deutch 10 pages Lewis Branscomb 11 pages William Brinkman 5 pages and Eric Bloch 14 pages. Also included at the Opening Remarks of Chairman George E. Brown Jr. 5 pages. Dr. Deutch testified in his capacity as an Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and referred to his holding several positions at the Department of Energy during the period 1978 to 1980. Professor Branscomb testified in his capacity as the Director Science Technology and Public Policy Program as the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Professor Branscomb had served as the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President and was thus the President's Science Advisor. William F. Brinkman testified as the Executive Director Research Physics Division of AT&T Bell Laboratories. William Frank Brinkman was an American physicist who served as president of the American Physical Society 2002 and was the head of the Office of Science at the United States Department of Energy 2009-2013. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1984 and won the George E. Pake Prize in 1994. Erich Bloch was a Distinguished Fellow Council on Competitiveness. Erich Bloch 1925 - 2016 was an electrical engineer and administrator. He was involved with developing IBM's first transistorized supercomputer 7030 Stretch and mainframe computer System/360. He served as director of the National Science Foundation from 1984 to 1990. Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: We are pleased to be here today to testify on the Department of Energy's DOE nuclear weapons laboratories. As you requested our testimony focuses on three areas: 1 the research development and testing RD&T capabilities of the Los Alamos and Livermore National Laboratories; 2 the recent trends in staffing and funding at DOE's weapons laboratories; and 3 options identified by the laboratories and DOE for consolidating the Los Alamos and Livermore RD&T programs. This<br/>testimony provides a baseline for future congressional deliberations on these issue. Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories maintain a deliberately redundant nuclear warhead research development and testing RD&T infrastructure. The redundancy<br/>between Los Alamos and Livermore was intended to stimulate competition in the nation's efforts to design nuclear warheads. With the end of the Cold War however the nature of the nuclear warhead RD&T effort at the laboratories has been changing rapidly. Changes in the world coupled with the possibility of substantial budget cuts in the nuclear weapons area brings into question whether the nation still needs or can financially sustain the laboratories' current level of redundancy. In summary although Los Alamos and Livermore have<br/>duplicative RD&T capabilities in general over the years their independent approaches have led to each developing specialized knowledge and capabilities. Over the past several years both RD&T funding and staffing have declined significantly at the laboratories. With this recent and anticipated continued decline in resources devoted to nuclear weapons RD&T some consolidation of the laboratories' functions has already occurred and more is in process. The laboratories believe the potential savings are small relative to the funds needed to maintain the entire nuclear weapons complex. The laboratories believe however that savings are possible by avoiding additional duplicative facilities in the future. Both laboratories strongly prefer the current two-laboratory structure for weapons design. However Los Alamos officials believe that if the nation is to maintain its nuclear competence in the event of further significant cuts in nuclear weapons RD&T the current structure may need to be radically altered. In addition they believe that any new configuration must maintain the current benefits of competition and peer review. United States General Accounting Office unknown‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 80751

‎United States General Accounting Office‎

‎Operation Desert Storm. Evaluation of the Air Campaign; GAO Report to the Ranking Minority Member Committee on Commerce House of Representatives GAO/NSIAD-97-134‎

‎Washington DC: General Accounting Office National Security and International Division June 1997. Presumed First Edition First printing White cover not usual blue cover--reprint/. Wraps. Good. 235 pages. Oversized book measuring 11 inches by 8/1-2 inches. Postage sticker and part of a shipping label roughly removed on rear cover. This report is the unclassified version of a classified report that the General Accounting Office issued in July 1996 on the Operation Desert Storm air campaign. At the request of John D. Dingell the Ranking Minority Member of the Committee on Commerce House of Representatives the Department of Defense reevaluated the security classification of the original report and as a result about 85 percent of the material originally determined to be classified has subsequently been determined to be unclassified and is presented in this report. The best available data did not permit GAO to either: 1 make a comprehensive system-by-system quantitative comparison of aircraft and weapon effectiveness; or 2 validate some of the key performance claims for certain weapon systems. Pursuant to Congressional direction GAO reviewed the Operation Desert Storm air campaign focusing on the: 1 use and performance of aircraft munitions and missiles employed during the air campaign; 2 validity of Department of Defense DOD and manufacturer claims particularly those for weapon systems utilizing advanced technology; 3 relationship between cost and performance of weapon systems; and 4 extent that Desert Storm air campaign objectives were met. GAO noted that: 1 air power clearly achieved many of Desert Storm's objectives but fell short of fully achieving others; 2 the available quantitative and qualitative data indicate that air power damage to several major target sets was more limited than DOD's title V report to the Congress stated; 3 these data show clear success against the oil and electrical target categories but less success against Iraqi air defense command control and communications and lines of communication; 4 success against nuclear-related mobile Scud and Republican Guard targets was the least measurable; 5 the lessons that can be learned from Desert Storm are limited because of the unique conditions the strike tactics employed by the coalition the limited Iraqi response and limited data on weapon system effectiveness; 6 the strong likelihood of campaign success enabled U.S. commanders to favor strike tactics that maximized aircraft and pilot survivability rather than weapon system effectiveness; 7 the Iraqis employed few if any electronic countermeasures and presented almost no air-to-air opposition; 8 as a result Desert Storm did not consistently or rigorously test all the performance parameters of aircraft and weapon systems used in the air campaign; 9 many of DOD's and manufacturers' postwar claims about weapon system performance were overstated misleading inconsistent with the best available data or unverifiable; 10 aircraft and pilot losses were historically low partly owing to the use of medium- to high-altitude munition delivery tactics that nonetheless both reduced the accuracy of guided and unguided munitions and hindered target identification and acquisition; 11 air power was inhibited by the limited ability of aircraft sensors to identify and acquire targets the failure to gather intelligence on critical targets and the inability to collect and disseminate battle damage assessments BDA in a timely manner; 12 the contributions of guided weaponry incorporating advanced technologies and their delivery platforms were limited because the cooperative operating conditions they require were not consistently encountered; 13 the important contributions of stealth and laser-guided bombs were emphasized as was the need for more and better BDA and less attention was paid to the significant contributions of less-sophisticated systems and the performance of critical tasks such as the identification and acquisition of targets; and 14 there was no apparent link between the cost of aircraft and munitions and their performance in Desert Storm. General Accounting Office, National Security and International Division paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 79427

‎United States General Accounting Office‎

‎Space Station; Cost to Operate After Assembly Is Uncertain GAO/NSIAD-99-177‎

‎Washington DC: United States General Accounting Office 1999. Presumed First Edition First Printing. Wraps. Very good. 38 pages. Illustration. Tabular Data. Footnotes. This is a "Report to Congressional Requesters". When completed around 2004 the goal of the International Space Station ISS is to provide the United States and its international partners with an Earth orbiting facility that supports human habitation and scientific research in a microgravity environment. Because of Russia's ongoing problems in funding its share of the space station's construction costs the National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA is concerned that Russia may also not be able to fulfill its commitments to fund ISS operations costs. NASA estimated that the annual cost to operate the completed space station will average $1.3 billion or $13 billion over a 10-year mission life. NASA anticipates sharing these costs with its international partners and it hopes to further reduce funding requirements through sharing with commercial users or through more efficient commercial operations. As requested by you and the late Representative George E. Brown Jr. we reviewed NASA's estimate for the cost to operate the space station after assembly is completed. Specifically we were asked to determine 1 if any space station-related costs are not included in NASA's estimate; 2 the level of uncertainty in the cost estimate for operations especially with regard to the potential impact of changes in Russian participation; and 3 how NASA funding requirements will be reduced by sharing costs with international partners or through commercial use and operations. NASA's $1.3 billion estimate does not include all funding requirements related to space station operations. NASA does not prepare budget estimates on a full-cost basis because it has not completed implementation of its full cost accounting system. Additional items that will have to be funded in the future within the space station budget include costs for upgrading obsolete systems and operating an alternative propulsion module. NASA has not developed detailed estimates for potential upgrades to combat component obsolescence and improve performance but space station officials believe that a robust enhancement program could cost $100 million or more per year. NASA has not estimated the cost of operating an alternative propulsion module being procured to provide reboost if Russia is unable to provide that function. Items that we determined to be space station-related that are funded in other NASA budget lines include space shuttle flights civil service personnel principal investigators and space communications; these are estimated to cost a total of $2.5 billion in fiscal year 2004. When NASA implements full cost accounting in 2001 some costs currently in other NASA budget lines will be included in the space station budget. In commenting on our draft report NASA stated that shuttle flights should be allocated to the overall cost of operating the space station using a marginal cost of $84 million per flight rather than an average cost of $435 million. We believe the average cost per flight more accurately represents NASA resources related to operating the space station. There is a high degree of uncertainty in NASA's estimate for the cost to operate the space station from 2005 to 2014. NASA's original estimate of $13 billion for operating the space station was developed to aid in evaluating life-cycle costs of redesign options rather than to accurately forecast budget needs. This estimate did not consider end-of-mission costs for either extending the life of the space station beyond 10 years or decommissioning it. The estimate was also developed for an earlier space station configuration that has since been modified. NASA does not prepare detailed budget estimates for the space station and other programs beyond fiscal year 2004 the last year of its current 5-year budget-planning period. NASA recently began an effort to review its operations cost estimate and develop a long-range funding profile that would better reflect annual requirements over the 10-year operations period. Adding to the uncertainty of future costs the full impact on operations if Russia is unable to fulfill its obligations is not known at this time. NASA would incur costs to operate an alternative propulsion module but does not yet know whether there will be a shortfall in Russian logistics flights or how such a shortfall would be spread among the shuttle and international partner resupply vehicles. United States General Accounting Office paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 91247

‎United States General Accounting Office‎

‎VA Hospitals: Issues and Challenges for the Future: Report to the Chairman Committee on Veterans' Affairs U.S. Senate‎

‎Washington DC: United States General Accounting Office 1998. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket. Cover has slight wear and soiling. 324 p. : ill. maps; 28 cm. Includes: Illustrations Maps. GAO/HEHS-98-32. This report examings how VA and community hospitals' care evolved during the 20th century including changes in supply and demand factors contributing to declining demand the extent of excess capacity and actions taken to increase efficiency and compete for patients. United States General Accounting Office paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 59761

‎United States; General Accounting Office‎

‎Law Enforcement Efforts to Control Domestically Grown Marijuana. Report to the Subcommittee on Government Information Justice and Agriculture Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives‎

‎Washington DC: General Accounting Office 1984. v 78p. wraps; 8.5x11 inches. General Accounting Office unknown books‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 155219

‎Unnamed, Unnamed‎

‎Random Structures & Algorithms: Volume 21, Numbers 3 and 4 October-December 2002‎

‎Special Issue: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference "Random Structures and Algorithms" Held August 6-10, 2001 . Slight wear to edges of binding. Contents clean and sound throughout. Used‎

‎Uppsala, Kiselman; Stockholm, Lech; Lund, J. Peetre; LinkOping, Widman (eds.)‎

‎Arkiv fOr Matematik: 13-14: 1975-76‎

‎Ex Library (University of London) hardcover in very good condition. No jacket. A few light marks on one or two pages. Label on front pastedown; stamps at a few points. Binding is sound; all content is clear. CM Used‎

‎US General Accounting Office U S‎

‎Government Corporations: Profiles of Existing Government Corporations December 1995. GAO/GGD-96-14‎

‎Washington DC: GAO 1995. First Edition. First Printing. good. 28 cm 186 wraps illus. footnotes GAO paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 46450

‎US General Accounting Office, Comptroller General of the United States U S‎

‎Major Management Challenges and Program Risks GAO/OCG-99-1 thru GAO/OCG-99-21; High-Risk Series: An Update GAO/HR-99-1‎

‎Place_Pub: Washington DC: GAO 1999. new. 1287 total 22-volume set wraps footnotes tables books removed from original shrink wrap for cataloguing. This special series of reports discusses governmentwide challenges which must be addressed to improve the performance management and accountability of federal agencies in volume 1 and focuses on the challenges confronting individual agencies in volumes 2-21. Volume 22 reports on government operations which the GAO has identified as "high risk" because of their greater vulnerabilities to waste fraud abuse and mismanagement. Subtitles as follows: A Governmentwide Perspective GAO/OCG-99-1 130 pg.; Dept. of Agriculture GAO/OCG-99-2 48 pg.; Dept. of Commerce GAO/OCG-99-3 56 pg.; Dept. of Defense GAO/OCG-99-4 74 pg.; Dept. of Education GAO/OCG-99-5 40 pg.; Dept. of Energy GAO-OCG-99-6 36 pg.; Dept. of Health and Human Services GAO-OCG-99-7 53 pg.; Dept. of Housing and Urban Development GAO-OCG-99-8 72 pg.; Dept. of the Interior GAO/OCG-99-9 41 pg.; Dept. of Justice GAO/OCG-99-10 55 pg.; Dept. of Labor GAO/OCG-99-11 41 pg.; Dept. of State GAO/OCG-99-12 39 pg.; Dept. of Transportation GAO/OCG-99-13 75 pg.; Dept. of the Treasury GAO/OCG-99-14 85 pg.; Dept. of Veterans Affairs GAO/OCG-99-15 55 pg.; Agency for International Development GAO/OCG-99-16 22 pg.; Environmental Protection Agency GAO/OCG-99-17 48 pg.; National Aeronautics and Space Admin. GAO/OCG-99-18 33 pg.; Nuclear Regulatory Commission GAO/OCG-99-19 26 pg.; Social Security Administration GAO/OCG-99-20 36 pg.; U.S. Postal Service GAO/OCG-99-21 42 pg.; High-Risk Series: An Update GAO/HR-99-1 180 pg. GAO paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 52266

‎US General Accounting Office U S‎

‎Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost-Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-Powered Carriers. GAO/NSIAD-98-1‎

‎Washington DC: GAO 1998. First Edition. First Printing. good. 28 cm 192 wraps illus. footnotes GAO paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 49870

‎US General Accounting Office U S‎

‎Statement of Open Recommendations: Improving Operations of Federal Department and Agencies‎

‎Washington DC: GAO 1994. good. 240 wraps includes two computer disks inside front cover tables Appendix I is a quick reference to the electronic edition. Front cover slightly weak probably due to presence of computer diskettes. Annual Report to the Chairman House and Senate Committees on Appropriations. GAO document B-205879. In fiscal year 1993 GAO made over 1 500 recommendations. This report includes summaries highlighting the impact of GAO's work and information on the status of all GAO recommendations that have not been fully implemented. The set of computer diskettes have details on all open recommendations. The diskettes have several menu options to help users find information easily. This is an interesting and important snapshot of government operations at the start ofthe Clinton Administration. GAO paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 40435

‎US General Accounting Office, Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division U S‎

‎Technology Transfer: Barriers Limit Royalty Sharing's Effectiveness. Report to Congressional Committees. GAO/RCED-93-6‎

‎Place_Pub: Washington DC: GAO 1992. First Edition. First Printing. good. 28 cm 128 wraps illus. pencil erasure on page 1 mailing label on rear cover. Published in December 1992. GAO paperback‎

書籍販売業者の参照番号 : 52823