2409 risultati
1843rif. 63627Kjøbenhavn 1843. 8vo. Contemporary half calf with marbled boards and gilt title to spine. Spine worn with loss of leather. Damp stain to upper part of leaves until p. 31. and again at the end. Last leaf with a marginal repair far from affecting text. Brownspotting. Stamp to title-page p. 1 and last page Theoloigical Library the one on title-page overwritten with ownership signature. VIII 135 pp. Scarce first edition of one of Kierkegaard's most splendid and most sought-after works in thich the “Leap of Faith” is introduced. Although Fear and Trembling is evidently printed in the same number of copies as almost all the other works by Kierkegaard i.e. ca 525 this is one of the most difficult of his works to find in the first edition. Perhaps later research will show whether unsold copies were destroyed which seems unlikely however. We know that in July or August 1847 321 copies of Fear and Trembling had been sold. What we also know is that it is highly sought-after by collectors and much less frequently on the market than most of Kierkegaard’s other works. Fear and Trembling is one of Kierkegaard’s most important works. And it is also one of his most difficult. It deals – in forceful brevity – with the relationship between reason and faith and provides us with Kierkegaard’s most thorough exposition of the religious stage which he considered the most meaningful form of existence. Setting the scene in his Preface with the punchy opening lines: “Not merely in the realm of commerce but in the world of ideas as well our age is organizing a regular clearance sale. Everything is to be had at such a bargain that it is questionable whether in the end there is anybody who will want to bid.”Preface Walter Lowrie’s translation 1941 Kierkegaard begins the work with a rendering of the biblical tale of Abraham and Isak from the Old Testament using it to illustrate how religious reasons can triumph over ethical. It is here that Kierkegaard introduces the “tragic hero” and contrasts it to the “Knight of Faith” who both ignore their own wishes for a higher good. These two essential figures epitomize the ethical and the religious and pave the way for the understanding of these stages in Kierkegaard’s philosophy. It is arguably also here that the idea of the essential leap of faith is introduced for the first time. The Knight of Faith sacrifices his son at the command of God and thus sets aside an ethical demand in in order to attain a higher goal that exists beyond the ethical. This teleological suspension of the ethical requires a leap of faith that is only possible through faith in virtue of the absurd. In many ways Fear and Trembling is the most forceful of Kierkegaard’s works as is also indicated by the title. Kierkegaard himself also considered it one of his most significant productions and wrote in his posthumously published Notebooks: “Oh once I am dead Fear and Trembling alone will be enough for an imperishable name as an author. Then it will be read translated into foreign languages as well. The reader will almost shrink from the frightful pathos in the book.” NB 12:147 1849. This splendidly dense work which so magnificently weaves together existential concerns with biblical interpretation is responsible for the introduction of many of the concepts that are most fundamental to Kierkegaard’s philosophy and is essential to the understanding of his thought. Himmelstrup 48 hardcover
1859rif. 63630Kjøbenhavn 1859. 8vo. Nice contemporary black half calf with four raised bands to gilt spine. Spine and corners worn. Light occasional brownspotting. 4 114 1 pp. First edition of Kierkegaard’s final work on his own authorship. Kierkegaard had published only one of his three works on his own authorship namely the short resumé On My Work as an Author of the present work which he did not dare publish because he was afraid of being misunderstood by his contemporaries. The work constitutes a frank account of his method of authorship and also serves as a paramount piece of autobiography. In 1846 Kierkegaard had started using a protocol as his journal. This is the first of the journals denoted NB that he continued throughout the rest of his life. These journal entries amounting to 36 volumes in all are filled with attempts at understanding himself his purpose the meaning of his writings and not least how he himself understood his authorship and wished for it to be understood in posterity. These latter considerations are the basis of the” The Point of View for My Work as an Author” which Kierkegaard left unpublished not wishing to be viewed as self-glorifying to be published posthumously by Peter Kierkegaard Søren’s brother. The considerations of whether to let “The Point of View for My Work as an Author” – which Kierkegaard also calls “The Confession of one Dying” – remain unpublished until after his death fill a lot in the notebooks from 1849 eg. NB 10:6; NB 10:60; NB 10:169; NB 11:123; NB 11:195 clearly showing how much this work meant to Kierkegaard who finally decided that it could indeed only be published posthumously. Himmelstrup 292. hardcover
1846rif. 63628Kjøbenhavn C.A. Reitzel 1846. 8vo. Contemporary black full cloth with gilt lettering to spine. Binding somewhat faded and spotted. stamp to title-page and remains of ink numbering. Some brownspotting and a bit of damp staining. Lacking lower blank corner of title-page and upper blank corner restored. Far from affecting text. 114 pp. First edition of Kierkegaard's important review of Thomasine Gyllembourg's "Two Ages". Having finished his “first” authorship with his monumental “Unscientific Concluding Postscript” the “Literary Review of Thomasine Gyllembourg’s Two Ages” invokes Kierkegaard’s second authorship. The Literary Review is a classic within the conservative critique of modern society. It is here that Kierkegaard presents his most concise and significant analysis of modern society as it shows itself through the press in the relationship between public authorities and the subjects. The work was printed amidst the Corsair-Affair which was a defining event in Kierkegaard’s life and work. Having been unbearably ridiculed in periodical The Corsair since January 1846 Kierkegaard uses his Literary Review of Two Ages printed March 30th 1846 to convey his thoughts on the public and the individual’s relationship to it. Thomasine Gyllembourg was the mother of Johan Ludvig Heiberg and a magnificent author herself. She was one of the most productive authors of the Danish Golden Age despite having had her debut late in life at the age of 53. She was the founder of Danish feminist literature writing about the position of women in society and in the home. Her novel “Two Ages” portrays one of her eminent Madonna figures Claudine who despite her status as seduced and abandoned single mother stays true to herself her beliefs and her role as a mother. Claudine’s sexual liberty of the Revolutionary age is contrasted to the gentle and modest heroine of the present age whose identity is in caring for the home. As such Two Ages opposes the ideals of freedom from the age of the French Revolution with the bourgeois ideals of the Golden Age. In his review Kierkegaard is mainly concerned with the contrast between the two ages in the novel – that of The French Revolution and that contemporary with the novel. Expressed with Kierkegaard’s concepts the age of revolution is passionate and the present age dispassionate; Kierkegaard ends up attacking the conformity of the present age and the de-individualization of people into an abstract public. The inanimate beliefs and views of the present age become especially fatal in the daily press. As a reader one is no longer a passionate individual but part of an anonymous and diffuse public audience. Not until the single individual has established an ethical stance to the whole world as it is can there be any question of genuinely uniting. This is a clear reference to the ridicule Kierkegaard himself experienced due to the Corsair and a harsh verdict upon the Copenhagen audience. But it is not only Kierkegaard’s characterization of mass media that has made “A Literary Review” a conservative classic within the critique of modern society so has Kierkegaard’s description of how the dispassionate age has subverted all social hierarchies and put into question all the relative strength of the different powers of society. This magnificent work is one of Kierkegaard’s most political and that which gives us his clearest analysis of modern society. Himmelstrup 100. hardcover
1848rif. 62871Kjøbenhavn C.A. Reitzel 1848. 8vo. Beautiful a little later ca. 1870'ies brown half calf with gilt spine. Boards with blind-stamped pattern. Corners slightly bumped. a lively tight and well-preserved copy. Internally very fresh and clean with jst some occasional brownspotting. A faded owld ownership signature to title-page. A few notes in pencil. Some brownspotting. 103; 74; 96; 77 pp. Firste editiopn of Kierkegaard's Christian Discourses. Published in the midst of the politically tumultuous and revolutionary year 1848 Kierkegaard’s Christian Discourses occupies a unique and inspirational position in European literature. With its simplicity and reflective inwardness the four sections of discourses both invoke Kierkegaard’s collision with the established order of Christendom but at the same time serve as reassuring affirmations of the blessedness of Christian life – in the midst of a world that seemed to be governed by suffering uproar and fundamental change. Marx had published his Communist Manifesto on February 29 1848 Denmark had just gotten its first Prime Minister on March 22 and would get its first Constitution a year later. Kierkegaard’s Christian Discourses was published on April 25 1848. This was amid the most widespread revolutionary wave in European history also known as The Springtime of Nations and a mere month after the fall of the absolute monarchy in Denmark March 21st. But Kierkegaard recognized only one danger: the religious danger. On March 27 1848 he wrote in his journal: “So here I sit. Outside everything is in movement nationalism surges high in all everyone talks of sacrificing life and blood is perhaps ready to do it but supported by the omnipotence of public opinion. And here I sit in a quiet room I will doubtlessly soon be in ill repute for indifference to the national cause; I recognize only one danger: the religious danger.” NB 4:118. The Christian Discourses consists of twenty-eight discourses that are divided into four equal sections of seven discourses each on Biblical texts. The work is arranged in contrasting styles. Whereas Parts One The Cares of the Pagans and Three Thoughts That Wound from Behind--for Upbuilding are polemical and can be read as invoking Kierkegaard’s collision with the established order of Christendom Parts Two Joyful Notes in the Strife of Suffering and Four Discourses at the Communion on Fridays are reassuring for the single individual affirming the joy and blessedness of a Christian life. The work is written in a simple style accessible for everyone and it presents key Christian themes and concepts in a clear and simple way thus serving as one of the best introductions to the Christendom of Kierkegaard. It is furthermore here that he introduces his Discourses at the Communion on Fridays a completely novel genre that came to play a significant role in Kierkegaard’s later writings. The work was published in four parts with separate title-pages and with half-titles stating First to Fourth section. The work is almost always found in one volume as it also appeared but the four parts also appeared separately. Himmelstrup 110. hardcover
1960rif. 024831Koln: Jacob Hegner. Original black boards. Tiny corner bump Near Fine in Fine Dust Jacket in original Near Fine packing slipcase. Nice copy. . Near Fine. Hardcover. 1960. Jacob Hegner hardcover
1976rif. 2056003Indiana University Press 1976. Hardcover. Very Good. 8vo. Green cloth unjacketed. Seven volumes. Some rubbing and scuffing to cloth. Light bumping and edge wear to boards. A few faint damp-stains to fore-edges of text blocks presumably from coffee particularly that of volume 6 which is also stained at tail; texts themselves unaffected. Else fine. A very nice set with crisp clean internals. Indiana University Press hardcover
1849rif. 63142Kjøbenhavn Reitzel 1849. 8vo. In contemporary half calf. Spine with wear and scratches. Back hinge partly split. Previous owner's name "P. O. Bugge / 1852". First and last leaves slightly browned otherwise internally nice and clean. XIV 2 320; 4 250 pp final blank. Second edition of Kierkegaard’s Either-Or his magnum opus widely regarded as a foundational work of existentialism and among the most celebrated writings of the greatest Scandinavian philosopher. Kierkegaard is “now generally considered to be however eccentric one of the most important Christian philosophers” PMM 314. Kierkegaard's monumental magnum opus seminally influenced later as well as contemporary philosophy and ranks as one of the most important works of philosophy of modern times. Either-Or is the earliest of Kierkegaard’s major works and the work with which he begins his pseudonymous authorship. Kierkegaard’s pseudonymity is an entire subject unto its own. The various cover names he uses play a significant role in his way of communicating and are essential to the understanding of his philosophical and religious messages. And it all properly begins here with his groundbreaking magnum opus. Conjuring up two distinctive figures with diverging beliefs and modes of life – the aesthetic “A” of Part One and the ethical B note that this is the first “pseudonym” that Kierkegaard uses in his earliest articles – no. I above/Judge Vilhelm of Part Two Kierkegaard presents us with the most basic reflections on the search for a meaningful existence seen from two completely different philosophical views. This masterpiece of duality explores the foundational conflict between the ethical and the aesthetical providing us along the way with the now so famous contemplations on music Mozart drama boredom pleasures virtues and probably most famously seduction and rejection – The Seducer’s Diary. It is primarily Judge Vilhelm from Part Two of Either-Or that has bestowed upon Kierkegaard the reputation as the Father of Existentialism. His emphasis on taking ownership of oneself and the importance of making choices has made him the first personification of Existentialism and the idea that one does not passively develop into the self that he or she should be or ought to become. Kierkegaard went to great lengths to ensure that the public would not know the identity of the author was of Either-Or. He even had the draft of the work done by several hands so that employees at the printer’s would also be deceived. Despite his efforts however it did not take long for the public to guess that Kierkegaard had written this astounding work. But Kierkegaard himself kept up the façade and did not accept authorship until several years later. Nothing Kierkegaard did was left to chance which his carefully chosen pseudonyms also reflect. This also spills over in his presentation-inscriptions which follow as strict a pattern as the pseudonyms themselves – he never signed himself the author if his Christian name was not listed as the author on the title-page. And seeing that he had not accepted authorship of Either-Or and is not mentioned by name anywhere on the title-page also not as the editor nor publisher as with the other pseudonymous works he was not able to give away copies of his magnum opus which is why no presentation-copy of the first edition exists. The appearance of the second edition of this monumental work was naturally carefully planned. Either-Or first appeared in 1843 and due to the great demand for the work which had originally only been printed in ca 525 copies it had quickly been sold out; but Kierkegaard refused to have it reprinted. In 1849 finally he decided to let it appear again in a textually unchanged version. When the second edition appeared recte second issue Kierkegaard had meanwhile owned up to the authorship of Either-Or. He had done so in 1846 in his Concluding Unscientific Postscript to The Philosophical Fragments own translation: “For the sake of manners and etiquette I hereby acknowledge what can hardly in reality be of interest to anybody to know that I am as one says the author of Either-Or Victor Eremita Copenhagen in February 1843.”. Now finally Kierkegaard could give away his magnum opus! In his Papers from 1849 Kierkegaard states own translation: “The poets here at home each received a copy of Either-Or. I thought it my duty; and now I was able to do it; because now one cannot reasonably claim that a conspiracy is made concerning the book. -because the book is now old and its crisis over. Of course they were given the copy from Victor Eremita.” Pap. X1A 402. Naturally because “as little as I in Either-Or is the Seductor or the Assessor as little am I the publisher Victor Eremita exactly as little; he is a poetically-real subjective thinker as he is also found in “in vino veritas.” “ the postscript to the Postscript 1846 Either-Or is now not only the title of Kierkegaard’s most famous and widely read work it is also a phrase that summarizes much of the thinking for which he is best known and a cornerstone of what we now characterize as Existentialism. The first edition caused a sensation. The second issue termed “edition” although it is textually unaltered is not only the first edition of the work to appear after Kierkegaard had acknowledged authorship of it and thus also confirmed being one and the same with his most famous pseudonym it is also the first of Kierkegaard’s works to appear in a second edition or issue. The second edition of the work is thus also of the utmost importance and is one of the only important second editions of any of Kierkegaard’s works. PMM: 314 Himmelstrup 21 unknown
1843rif. 62137Kjøbenhavn Reitzel 1843. 8vo. VIII 135 pp. Completely uncut in the original blue cardboard binding. Spine and front hinge neatly restored preserving part of the original printed title-label. Brownspotting as usual. Overall a very nice copy indeed. Old owners’ names to inside of front board N. Pedersen 18/8 1879 and C. Wegener. A splendid copy of one of Kierkegaard's most splendid and most sought-after works in the original binding which is extremely rare. The spines of the original Kierkegaard cardboard bindings are always just thin paper directly glued on the block making them extremely fragile and the original paper-labels are hardly every preserved. Although Fear and Trembling is evidently printed in the same number of copies as almost all the other works by Kierkegaard i.e. ca 525 this is one of the most difficult of his works to find in the first edition. Perhaps later research will show whether unsold copies were destroyed which seems unlikely however. We know that in July or August 1847 321 copies of Fear and Trembling had been sold. What we also know is that it is highly sought-after by collectors and much less frequently on the market than most of Kierkegaard’s other works. It is very odd that not a single copy on special paper or in a gift-binding presentation-copy or anything like that has been located or registered. For this title a Kierkegaard-collector will have to make do with a “normal” copy. The present copy in the original binding and completely uncut is the best copy we have come across over the last many decades. FEAR AND TREMBLING is one of Kierkegaard’s most important works. And it is also one of his most difficult. It deals – in forceful brevity – with the relationship between reason and faith and provides us with Kierkegaard’s most thorough exposition of the religious stage which he considered the most meaningful form of existence. Setting the scene in his Preface with the punchy opening lines: “Not merely in the realm of commerce but in the world of ideas as well our age is organizing a regular clearance sale. Everything is to be had at such a bargain that it is questionable whether in the end there is anybody who will want to bid.”Preface Walter Lowrie’s translation 1941 Kierkegaard begins the work with a rendering of the biblical tale of Abraham and Isak from the Old Testament using it to illustrate how religious reasons can triumph over ethical. It is here that Kierkegaard introduces the “tragic hero” and contrasts it to the “Knight of Faith” who both ignore their own wishes for a higher good. These two essential figures epitomize the ethical and the religious and pave the way for the understanding of these stages in Kierkegaard’s philosophy. It is arguably also here that the idea of the essential leap of faith is introduced for the first time. The Knight of Faith sacrifices his son at the command of God and thus sets aside an ethical demand in in order to attain a higher goal that exists beyond the ethical. This teleological suspension of the ethical requires a leap of faith that is only possible through faith in virtue of the absurd. In many ways Fear and Trembling is the most forceful of Kierkegaard’s works as is also indicated by the title. Kierkegaard himself also considered it one of his most significant productions and wrote in his posthumously published Notebooks: “Oh once I am dead Fear and Trembling alone will be enough for an imperishable name as an author. Then it will be read translated into foreign languages as well. The reader will almost shrink from the frightful pathos in the book.” NB 12:147 1849. This splendidly dense work which so magnificently weaves together existential concerns with biblical interpretation is responsible for the introduction of many of the concepts that are most fundamental to Kierkegaard’s philosophy and is essential to the understanding of his thought. Not a single presentation-copy of the work is known to exist and none has ever been registered nor identified. We know from the auction catalogue that Kierkegaard had two copies in his collection one in “dainty binding” but neither copy has been located. Himmelstrup 48 The present copy is no. 18 in Girsel's "Kierkegaard" The Catalogue which can be found here. unknown
1844rif. 62257Kjøbenhavn Reitzel 1844. Small 8vo. 164 pp. Completely uncut in the original printed light green wrappers with the text of the title-page repeated inside a frame to front board printed author and title to spine and the printing year within the same repeated frame to the back board. An almost untouched copy with just a tiny crease to the front wrapper and a tiny little nick to lower capital at back hinge. A bit of brownspotting due to the quality of the paper. Housed in an elegant green half morocco box with gilt lines and Gothic gilt lettering to spine. Green marbled paper boards and gilt super ex libris to front board Anker Kysters Eftf. And gilt by Hagel Olsen. A truly remarkable copy of the first edition in completely original condition in the fragile original wrappers virtually untouched. We have seen copies in the original wrappers before but never in this state. This is a truly amazing survival. In uncut state the work is a lot larger than regular copies – more than a cm taller and also significantly wider. By many Philosophical Fragments is considered Kierkegaard’s actual religious-philosophical main work. It is the first book written under the important pseudonym Johannes Climacus and it is here that Kierkegaard unfolds the tension between philosophy and religion in an attempt to find a historical onset for eternal consciousness opposing the ideological thought inherited by Plato Aristotle and Hegel. Through Climacus Kierkegaard contrasts the paradoxes of Christianity with Greek and modern philosophical thinking. He begins with Greek Platonic philosophy exploring the implications of venturing beyond the Socratic understanding of truth acquired through recollection to the Christian experience of acquiring truth through grace. It is in Philosophical Fragments that Kierkegaard’s polemic against the philosophy of Hegel becomes most obvious portraying clearly for the first time how the salvation of man can only be found through the paradoxical inversion of the rational values of speculative philosophy and through the “leap of faith” in the crucified Christ. It is here that we have the very root of Existentialism. In his preface Kierkegaard hints at a possible “sequel to Philosophical Fragments in 17 pieces”; this sequel was published in 1846 namely as the 600 pages long Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments which is 83 pages long…. Only one single presentation-copy of Philosophical Fragments is known to exist. Himmelstrup: 62. The present copy is no. 23 in Girsel's "Kierkegaard" The Catalogue which can be found here. hardcover
1844rif. 62265Kjøbenhavn Reitzel 1844. 8vo. 100 pp. Completely uncut in the original printed brown wrappers with the text of the title-page repeated inside a frame to front board printed author and title to spine and the printing year within the same repeated frame to the back board. Lacking a bit of paper on the spine but 2/3 of the original spineprinting preserved. Back wrapper lacking small piece of blank paper ca. 2 x ½ cm. Light brownspotting to wrappers as well as leaves. An excellent copy housed in a beautiful custom-made half morocco box with richly gilt spine in contemporary style. Gilt super ex-libris to front. The first edition in the exceedingly scarce original printed wrappers of Kierkegaard's religious accompaniment to his seminal philosophical stage work Stages on Life's Way Three Discourses on Imagined Occasions. As Stages on Life’s Way Three Discourses. is divided into three sections: confession marriage and death – three crucial occasions in the life of each single individual. The three imagined discourses that constitute the present work – What It Means To Seek God On the Occasion of a Confessional Service; Love Conquers All On the Occasion of a Wedding; The Decisiveness of Death At the Side of a Grave – deal with fundamental questions such as guilt sin forgiveness marriage and death. They all involve the anxiety of making a decision a theme that is central in Kierkegaard’s philosophical as well as religious thought placing these imagined discourses centrally in Kierkegaard’s “first” authorship. Himmelstrup 76. The present copy is no. 30 in Girsel's "Kierkegaard" The Catalogue which can be found here. unknown
1844rif. 62263Kjøbenhavn Reitzel 1844. Small 8vo. 110 1 pp. Completely uncut in the original blue cardboard-binding. Minimal wear to capitals and hinges with a tiny tear to front upper and back hinge. Minute paper loss to capitals and minimal loss to one corner. The printed title-label preserved in its entirety. Brownspotting due to the quality of the paper.A truly magnificent copy in completely original state – almost looks like it came straight off the press. First edition of Kierkegaard's most humorous book Prefaces in the very rare original blue binding in truly magnificent state and with the printed title-label preserved in its entirety. Published simultaneously with The Concept of Anxiety Prefaces can be viewed as its companion piece. It represents an altogether different genre and is the most humorous of all of Kierkegaard’s works but the two fictional authors of the works interestingly contrast each other. Although having been eclipsed by the now notoriously famous Concept of Anxiety Prefaces was in fact more popular when it appeared and sold many more copies. Written under the pseudonym of Nicolaus Notabene the “author” name indicates that despite its humorous approach Prefaces is still something serious – something to be noted. And it certainly is. It is here that we find Kierkegaard’s sarcastic roasting of the Hegelian system and of the Danish Hegelians with Johan Ludvig Heiberg as the main representant. Through Notabene he makes fun of Heiberg and Hegel who both want to explain everything and want to be mediators of understanding. Just as Hafniensis in The Concept on Anxiety poses that “how sin came into the world each man understands solely by himself. If he would learn it from another he would misunderstand it” p. 51 so Notabene in Prefaces states that “My frame my health my entire constitution do not lend themselves to mediation” p. 45. In Prefaces we also find Kierkegaard’s thoughts about the relationship between the reading public and the author and his fierce criticism of literary critics and reviewers among these also Heiberg as well as Martensen who famously reviewed Either-Or and Repetition respectively. And in the very amusing preface to the Prefaces we are given another glimpse into Kierkegaard’s thoughts on marriage and the dilemma he found himself in with Regine – the inner struggle between he who is the husband and he who is the author; can one be both With its challenging notions on the idea of the book and the interaction of the book with its readers his little ironic masterpiece is a clear forerunner of Postmodernism. “Kierkegaard’s ‘Prefaces’ is a brief though not unimportant work. Themes he develops elsewhere at greater length here are presented with characteristic insight and wit. This richly suggestive text has never received the attention it deserves. William McDonald’s fine translation now makes it possible to assess the importance of ‘Prefaces’ for Kierkegaard’s œuvre and to appreciate its significance for philosophical literary and theological issues that are still with us.” From the review of William McDonald’s 1989 edition of Prefaces in English in the Kierkegaard and Postmodernism-series. Written under a pseudonym and without Kierkegaard’s name appearing as publisher or indeed as anything else he was unable to give away presentation-copies of the work due to his own strict set of rules for this. Thus not a single presentation copy of the work exists. A single copy of the book was in the auction catalogue of his book collection after his death. Himmelstrup 70. The present copy is no. 28 in Girsel's "Kierkegaard" The Catalogue which can be found here. unknown
rif. DADAX0199698678New unknown
rif. DADAX0415792878New unknown
rif. DADAX0415822408New unknown
rif. DADAX0198723210New unknown
rif. DADAX0415868319New unknown
rif. DADAX0520338790New unknown
rif. DADAX0367590034New unknown
rif. DADAX0333676564New unknown
rif. DADAX0253029368New unknown
1843rif. 62941Kjøbenhavn Philipsen 1843-45. 8vo. 4 52 62 1 blank leaf 84 59 including the blank leaf between the title-page and the preface! 70 1 blank leaf 111 pp. Completely uncut in the original brownish grey boards with original printed title-label to spine fully intact. Boards a bit brownspotted and a larger damp stain to top of front board. A couple of smaller stains lacquer or wax to spine. A few horizontal creases to spine with paper almost invisibly glued back on to hold tight. Occasional brownspotting mostly to the first and last leaves. But overall splendidly preserved. A truly magnificent copy of the first edition of this very scarce Kierkegaard-title in completely original condition with all of the original printed title-label preserved and fully complete with the joint title-page contents all the half-titles dedications blanks etc. This Kierkegaard-title is rare in itself with much less than 278 copies printed in all but it is utterly amazing to find this exceedingly rare book in original state like here. Only very few copies are left in the original binding which we have only seen once before. The spines of the original Kierkegaard cardboard bindings are always just thin paper directly glued on the block making them extremely fragile. If one finds these original bindings the spines are almost always more or less disintegrated. The present copy is a rare exception that furthermore has the original title-label which is of the utmost scarcity. To our knowledge only one other copy in the original binding has been located. Apart from the other copy we have seen of this work in the original binding the present copy is also the only original Kierkegaard-binding we have seen that is not in the usual blue “hollanderet” cardboard binding but plain brown. No other such copy has been registered for sale and no other such copy to our knowledge is registered in any institution. Furthermore this seems to be the only copy to have surfaced so far which has preserved the original printed title-label in its entirety. As far as we know it has been recorded no-where due to its extreme scarcity. Kierkegaard’s Upbuilding or Edifying Discourses were published over the course of two years in 1843 and 1844. In all 18 Upbuilding Discourses were published divided over six publications namely: Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 Three Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 Four Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1844 Three Upbuilding Discourses from 1844 Four Upbuilding Discourses from 1844 Each of these publications accompanied one of the main pseudonymous works beginning with Either-Or in 1843. As opposed to his major philosophical works the religious upbuilding discourses actually bear the name of the author on the title-page. Of course this was by no means incidental. While the pseudonymous works could raise the question of the religiousness of the author the parallelly written religious discourses stress the fact that we are dealing with an author who was religious from the very beginning – an essential fact that Kierkegaard wished to stress for those interested in his authorship. In his journals Kierkegaard clearly states that the religious discourses are as significant in his oeuvre as a whole as are the larger pseudonymous works “I began with “Either-Or” and two upbuilding discourses.” he says and explains that he intended the upbuilding the religious to advance and that he wanted to show “that the writer was not an aesthetic author who in the course of time grew older and for that reason became religious”. Journals IX A 227. He was religious all along also during all of the major philosophical publications that were not written in his name. The fact that every major pseudonymous work – up until Concluding Unscientific Postscript appeared and revealed the identity of the real author – was accompanied by one of these small Upbuilding Discourses bears testament to the pivotal role they play in Kierkegaard’s philosophical development. Furthermore while Kierkegaard could not present anyone with copies of his pseudonymous works as explained above he could indeed give away presentation-copies of his accompanying Upbuilding Discourses which he then did. The Upbuilding Discourses are particularly interesting in several regards one being that it is in the course of the printing of these that Kierkegaard changes his publisher. Ever since Kierkegaard had chosen to publish his first book himself he had had his books on commission with the leading Copenhagen publisher Reitzel the sole exception being his thesis the Irony. That was also the case with Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1843. But for some reason the following five publications of Upbuilding Discourses did not appear with Reitzel but with P.G. Philipsen instead. We do not know the exact reason for this change in publishers as the commission was exactly the same for the two. Whereas Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 had sold relatively well the Three and Four Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 did not sell well. A mere 102 and 104 copies respectively out of a commission issue of 300 were sold. In an attempt at making money on these discourses in spite of the poor sales numbers Philipsen offers to buy the unsold copies of Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 buys a sales issue of 300 copies of the Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1844 and makes the same agreement with Kierkegaard for the following two Discourse-publications. Sales numbers are still poor however and in the spring of 1845 only ca 100 copies of each of the 1844 Discourse publications have been sold. The printing issue of each was about 500 and Philipsen’s sales issue 300; thus both Philipsen and Kierkegaard had large numbers of each Discourse-publication left and in May 1845 they make a new deal. Philipsen buys the remainder issues of all six Discourse-publications including the 278 copies of Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 from Reitzel. Philipsen has a joint title-page printed along with a contents-leaf and now issues the seminal Kierkegaard-publication that is no. 85 in the bibliography Himmelstrup namely Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses – all six publications constituting all eighteen Upbuilding Discourses collected in one book. Seeing that there were 278 copies left of the Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 a maximum of 278 copies of Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses can have been made making it one of the scarcest Kierkegaard-books. The actual number is certainly lower than 278 though probably quite a bit lower seeing that Philipsen continued to sell the separate publications all copies of which he then evidently did not include in the Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses. The individual pamphlets of course are even scarcer with a maximum of 232 copies of Two Upbuilding Discourses from 1843 and somewhere between 100 and 150 copies of the others. We know from the Erindringsbog fra Bianco Luno 1844 that Kierkegaard had 506 copies of Four Upbuilding Discourses 1844 printed six of them on fine paper for presentation. Seeing that we have already established the clear thread of identity throughout all six publications we must assume that the other pamphlets were printed in the same numbers. And we have the record of the remainder issues that Philipsen buys in 1845 which lets us conclude of the Upbuilding Discourses that by that time 222 copies of Two 1843 139 copies of Three 1843 130 copies of Four 1843 120 copies of Two 1844 92 copies of Three 1844 96 copies of Four 1844 were sold out of the total number of original issues. In other words these are extremely scarce. Not least in the original wrappers or bindings. The scarcest Kierkegaard-title that exists however will be found in the continuation of the printing history of the Upbuilding Discourses. It is the mythically rare title of Sixteen Upbuilding Discourses which Philipsen issued in 1852 when the Two Upbuilding Discourses had been sold out and it was no longer possible to collect Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses. Thus Philipsen had yet another title-page printed this time with Sixteen Upbuilding Discourses as the title and the year 1843-45 on it along with a new index-leaf; he issued this the scarcest of all Kierkegaard-titles in March 1852. “It is not known how large the issue was but it cannot have been more than 83 seeing that that was what was left of Three Upbuilding Discourses from 1843.” Tekstspejle p. 54 translated from Danish. The idea of the Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses let alone the Sixteen was not Kierkegaard’s. He had agreed to the Eighteen but it was not his intended project with the Upbuilding Discourses. Therefore he wished for the book not to be reviewed and he naturally did not give away any copies of the Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses and of course not the Sixteen either only the individual pamphlets. In all seven presentation-copies of the different Upbuilding Discourses are registered all being for either Heiberg or Nielsen. Curiously neither Eighteen nor Sixteen Upbuilding Discourses were to be found in Kierkegaard’s book collection after his death. All the individual pamphlets were however along with a copy of the first nine Upbuilding Discourses – i.e. the three publications from 1843 – bound together. For more on the conundrum of the actual number of copies of the Upbuilding Discourses see the Preface by Flemming Chr. Nielsen in Girsel’s Kierkegaard-catalogue p. 19. Himmelstrup 85 hardcover
1843rif. 62218Kjøbenhavn Reitzel 1843. Small 8vo. 157 pp. Original blue cardboard-binding. The spine has been restored but it has the original printed paper title-label partly preserved. Hinges are a bit weak and there is some edgewear. Browning and brownspotting but not more than usual. Completely uncut. Housed in a nice custom-made half lather box in pastiche style with richly gilt spine. The first edition in the very rare original blue binding with most of the original printed title-label preserved. REPETITION – not only the title of one of his most significant books but also a key concept in the philosophy of Kierkegaard – was written during the same brief spell of feverish activity that also produced Fear and Trembling; the two books were even published on the same day. ”Say what you will this question will play a very important role in modern philosophy for repetition is a crucial expression for what “recollection” was to the Greeks. Just as they taught that all knowing is a recollecting modern philosophy will teach that all life is a repetition.” Repetition p. 3 – translation by Hong Kierkegaard states in the beginning of his treatise anticipating the importance that his concept of Repetition is to have for modern philosophy. Written in the narrative form of an experimental novel centered on two stories that are internally linked Kierkegaard lets us understand what Repetition could be and what it is in his philosophy. The first story portrays Repetition as something empty and trivial whereas the second portrays it as an ethical category that is inextricably linked to religion. Repetition is that which makes it possible for man to become and to remain present in the present. Kierkegaard’s explanation of his key concept of Repetition is exhausted in the present work but it also plays a significant role throughout his later works and is considered one of the key concepts in his philosophy. The work is centered around the story of a young man who has fallen in love with an innocent young girl to whom he has become engaged. But finding himself unable to consummate the love because of poetic stirrings inside himself he tries to understand what is going on inside him and whether or not he should break off the engagement. The elderly Constantin Constantius one of Kierkegaard’s numerous pseudonyms interferes with the emotions of our young man and begins to conduct speculative experiments with him that are meant to investigate whether a repetition of the relationship with the girl of the young man’s feelings etc. might be possible. At the end of the first part the young man flees Copenhagen and leaves the girl presumably at her wits’ end. Later she marries someone else and the young man transforms into the true poet that he could only be when unattached to the girl he loved. It does not take much of an imagination to link this story to the Kierkegaard’s own wildly famous love story and failed engagement to Regine Olsen. It all begins in 1837 when Kierkegaard meets the lovely young girl Regine Olsen at a visit to the widowed Cathrine Rørdam. Three years later in September 1840 after having corresponded frequently with her and visited her on numerous occasions Kierkegaard decides to ask for her hand in marriage. She and her family accept but the following day Kierkegaard regrets his decision and ends up finally breaking off the engagement in October 1841. Disregarding the scandal the heartbreak his own included and the numerous pleas from family members and friends alike Kierkegaard’s tortured soul still searching for God and for the meaning of faith cannot continue living with the promise of marriage. Later the same month he flees Copenhagen and the scandal surrounding the broken engagement. He leaves for Berlin the first of his four stays there clearly tortured by his decision but also intent on not being able to go through with the engagement. As is evident from his posthumously published Papers Kierkegaard’s only way out of the relationship was to play a charming but cold villain a charlatan not betraying his inner thoughts and feelings. It is during his stay in Berlin his first of four altogether right after the rupture of the engagement that he begins writing Either-Or parts of which like Repetition can be read as an almost autobiographical rendering of his failed engagement. Repetition more than any other work lets us see how Kierkegaard came to be as an author through his tumultuous inner life during his engagement and the ending of it. Like Fear and Trembling there are no presentation-copies known to exist of Repetition. Himmelstrup 53 unknown
1855rif. 62984Kjøbenhavn C.A. Reitzel 1855. 8vo. Bound in contemporary half calf with gilt lettering to spine. A bit of wear to extremities. Internally with a bit of marginal browning. Øieblikket: 20 31 16 23 32 26 77 30 22 pp.; Dette skal siges. 12 pp. First edition of both works. Øieblikket with all nine numbers in first issue is very rare. Himmelstrup 180 177. unknown
1836rif. 62102Kjøbenhavn 1834-1836. Large 4to. Interimsblade i.e. Interim Papers 1-100 with the joint title-page and the contents leaf bound in a very nice contemporary brown half calf with gilt spine and marbled paper over boards. Spine with wear and hinges and corners bumped. Edges of boards with wear. Occasional brownspotting throughout but all in all a fine and well preserved copy. Each “Interimsblad” takes up 4 pp. Kierkegaard’s contributions: I: ab. 1 p.; II: 2 3/4 pp.; III: 4 pp.; IV: 4 pp. Very rare first printings of Kierkegaard’s first four publications including the very first publication in Kierkegaard’s own name which constitutes a true milestone in the history of Kierkegaard’s opus as does of course his very first publication. KIERKEGAARD’S VERY EARLIEST publications are the papers that he publishes in Kjøbenhavns Flyvende Post before he publishes his famous first book which is a polemic attack on Hans Christian Andersen. The first and fourth of these earliest periodical publications are arguably the most important being the very first thing Kierkegaard publishes and the very first publication in Kierkegaard’s own name respectively; but all these four earliest papers Himmelstrup 123 and 4 are significant 23 and 4 dealing with contemporary press issues primarily freedom of press. Danish politics in the 1830’es was dominated by the slow implementation of rules for election for and assembly of the Estates of the Realm. But as they were only advisory the papers and periodicals were not allowed to publish their opinions. In response to this a liberal opposition arose around the two polemic papers Kjøbenhavnsposten The Copenhagen Post and Fædrelandet The Fatherland. The first point on the agenda for the Liberals was the fight for freedom of the press and the abolishment of censorship. This fight for freedom of the press was something that found resonance with Copenhagen academics and it stirred up a lively activity in Copenhagen. In 1835 active Liberals had encouraged King Frederik VI to support freedom of press but had received an answer stating that he alone was able to evaluate what was truly the best for the people and the state. After this answer from the king the “Society for the Correct Use of the Freedom of press” was founded by moderate liberals and young liberals and at the end of the year almost 2.300 members had joined. It was in the midst of all this that the 21-year old Søren Kierkegaard then a student of theology had his debut with political-literary articles in Kjøbenhavns flyvende Post in Interimsbladende which were published separately. But as opposed to the predominantly liberal views of almost all other contributors Kierkegaard’s articles expressed distinctly conservative views. His first publication Også et Forsvar for Qvindens høie Anlæg Also a Defense of the High Abilities of the Woman constitutes an unpolished ironic apology for the liberation of women. This article is published in December 1834 and is signed “A.”. As opposed to the following next three articles this does not deal with freedom of press. Kierkegaard’s three following publications however all concern the question of freedom of press and constitute satirical polemics against the two liberal papers Kjøbenhavnsposten and Fædrelandet against Orla Lehmann the upcoming star of the liberal youth and against all liberals in general. These three articles were published in February and April 1836. The two first are signed “B.” and the third signed “S. Kierkegaard” constitutes the very first publication in his own name. As is well known the names under which Kierkegaard later publishes come to play a significant role in his authorship and represent an extremely thorough and well-thought-out construction. The foundation of this play with the reader is thus laid in the present publications in which he begins to develop the style for which he later gained worldwide renown. The “names” A and B under which he here publishes will most famously be used again in Either- Or Part one of which consists in “A.’s Papers” and Part Two in “B.’s Papers Letters to A.” Common for all four of his first publications is the attempt at polemic and satirical power at literary elegance and at a masterful and ceremonious critique of the prose of the opponent – all dominant traits in his later writings. Kjøbenhavns flyvende Post The Flying Post of Copenhagen was one of the most important and most widely read cultural and literary periodicals of the period. It was edited and run by Johan Ludvig Heiberg 1791-1860 arguably the most famous cultural person during the Danish Golden Age. He played a more significant role than any other author or thinker during this period and was the leading character of literature and philosophy in the 19th century. He introduced many German thinkers to Denmark most importantly Hegel – who Kierkegaard would later oppose – and he was part of almost all intellectual discussions of the Danish Golden Age. He was also a patron for many leading figures of the era. Interestingly several people thought that the first of the articles on the freedom of the press was written by Heiberg. This was of dubious merit to Kierkegaard himself as he was opposed to the circles around Heiberg and the Hegelian environment but it was still this article – and this miscomprehension – that gave him a claim to fame. Another paper claimed that this “priceless” article had been written by Heiberg himself who “had written many witty things but never anything as witty as this.” Also Kierkegaard’s professor of philosophy Poul Martin Møller to whom Kierkegaard was very devoted and to whom he dedicated Begrebet Angest the only person outside of his family that Kierkegaard ever wrote a printed dedication for loved the article and assumed that Heiberg had written it. “He Kierkegaard had a lifelong antipathy toward the press though he himself published reviews in various papers. His mistrust of the press as a legitimate organ of communication was based on several observations one of which was that the press was the voice of the masses rather than that of the individual. He viewed that voice with great skepticism and sarcasm in later years averring that the crowd. even if technically correct. is wrong by the very fact of being the crowd. The truth can only be stated and practiced as individuals especially as individuals before God. Admittedly Kierkegaard’s view of the masses was not well developed at this juncture.” D. Antony Storm. Himmelstrup: 1 2 3 & 4. The present copy is no. 1 in Girsel's "Kierkegaard" The Catalogue which can be found here. hardcover
1841rif. 62112Kjøbenhavn P.G. Philipsens Forlag 1841. 8vo. 4 350 pp. 1 f. blank 2 pp. advertisements. Completely uncut and partly unopened in the original brown cardboard binding. Rebacked with paper perfectly matching that of the boards. Corners restored. Title-page evenly browned and a few leaves with a bit of brownspotting but overall in unusually nice condition clean fresh and bright. Completely unmarked. A fabulous copy of the first edition of Kierkegaard’s dissertation here in the original binding which is of the utmost scarcity. We have only seen it in this state once before. And of all the copies we have handled of the Irony over the last decades we have only once before come across a copy with the advertisement-leaf in the back. This is virtually never present. This completely uncut copy is approximately 1 cm taller and wider than regular copies. The spines of the original Kierkegaard cardboard bindings are always just thin paper directly glued on the block making them extremely fragile especially on the thicker volumes. If one finds these original bindings the spines are almost always more or less disintegrated. Kierkegaard's dissertation constitutes the culmination of three years’ intensive studies of Socrates and “the true point of departure for Kierkegaard’s authorship” Brandes. The work is of the utmost importance in Kierkegaard’s production not only as his first academic treatise but also because he here introduces several themes that will be addressed in his later works. Among these we find the question of defining the subject of cognition and self-knowledge of the subject. The maxim of “know thyself” will be a constant throughout his oeuvre as is the theory of knowledge acquisition that he deals with here. The dissertation is also noteworthy in referencing many of Hegel’s theses in a not negative context something that Kierkegaard himself would later note with disappointment and characterize as an early uncritical use of Hegel. Another noteworthy feature is the fact that the thesis is written in Danish which was unheard of at the time. Kierkegaard felt that Danish was a more suitable language for the thesis and hadto petition the King to be granted permission to submit it in Danish rather than Latin. This in itself poses as certain irony as the young Kierkegaard was known to express himself poorly and very long-winded in written Danish. One of Kierkegaard’s only true friends his school friend H.P. Holst recounts in 1869 how the two had a special school friendship and working relationship in which Kierkegaard wrote Latin compositions for Holst while Holst wrote Danish compositions for Kierkegaard who “expressed himself in a hopelessly Latin Danish crawling with participial phrases and extraordinarily complicatedsentences” Garff p. 139. When Kierkegaard in 1838 was ready to publish his famous piece on Hans Christian Andersen see nr. 1 & 2 above which was to appear in Heiberg’s journal Perseus Heiberg had agreed to publish the piece although he had some severe critical comments about the way and the form in which it was written – if it were to appear in Perseus Heiberg demanded at the very least the young Kierkegaard would have to submit it in a reasonably readable Danish. “Kierkegaard therefore turned to his old schoolmate H. P. Holst and asked him to do something with the language…” Garff p. 139. From their school days Holst was well aware of the problem with Kierkegaard’s Danish and he recounts that over the summer he actually “translated” Kierkegaard’s article on Andersen into proper Danish. The oral defense was conducted in Latin however. The judges all agreed that the work submitted was both intelligent and noteworthy. But they were concerned about its style which was found to be both tasteless long-winded and idiosyncratic. We already here witness Kierkegaard’s idiosyncratic approach to content and style that is so characteristic for all of his greatest works. Both stylistically and thematically Kierkegaard’s and especially a clear precursor for his magnum opus Either-Or that is to be his next publication. The year 1841 is a momentous one in Kierkegaard’s life. It is the year that he completes his dissertation and commences his sojourn in Berlin but it is also the defining year in his personal life namely the year that he breaks off his engagement with Regine Olsen. And finally it is the year that he begins writing Either-Or. In many ways Either-Or is born directly out of The Concept of Irony and is the work that brings the theory of Irony to life. Part One of the dissertation concentrates on Socrates as interpreted by Xenophon Plato and Aristophanes with a word on Hegel and Hegelian categories. Part Two is a more synoptic discussion of the concept of irony in Kierkegaard’s categories with examples from other philosophers. The work constitutes Kierkegaard’s attempt at understanding the role of irony in disrupting society and with Socrates understood through Kierkegaard we witness a whole new way of interpreting the world before us. Wisdom is not necessarily fixed and we ought to use Socratic ignorance to approach the world without the inherited bias of our cultures. With irony we will be able to embrace the not knowing. We need to question the world knowing we may not find an answer. The moment we stop questioning and just accept the easy answers we succumb to ignorance. We must use irony to laugh at ourselves in order to improve ourselves and to laugh at society in order to improve the world. The work was submitted to the Philosophical Faculty at the University of Copenhagen on June 3rd 1841. Kierkegaard had asked for his dissertation to be ready from the printer’s in ample time for him to defend it before the new semester commenced. This presumably because he had already planned his sojourn to Berlin to hear the master philosopher Schelling. On September 16th the book was issued and on September 29th the defense would take place. The entire defense including a two hour long lunch break took seven hours during which ”an unusually full auditorium” would listen to the official opponents F.C. Sibbern and P.O. Brøndsted as well as the seven “ex auditorio” opponents F.C. Petersen J.L. Heiberg P.C. Kierkegaard Fr. Beck F.P.J. Dahl H .J.Thue og C.F. Christens not to mention Kierkegaard himself. Two weeks later on October 12th Kierkegaard broke off his engagement with Regine Olsen for the implications of this event see the section about Regine in vol. II. The work appeared in two states – one with the four pages of “Theses” for academics of the university whereas the copies without the theses were intended for ordinary sale. These sales copies also do not have “Udgivet for Magistergraden” and “theologisk Candidat” on the title-page. The present copy is one of the sales-copies without theses. Himmelstrup 8 The present copy is no. 11 in Girsel's "Kierkegaard" The Catalogue which can be found here. hardcover