16 533 résultats
réf. DADAX0415266246New unknown
réf. DADAX0415057809New unknown
réf. DADAX0415715482New unknown
réf. DADAX0367109298New unknown
réf. DADAX041537328XNew unknown
réf. DADAX0415349397New unknown
réf. DADAX0415364965New unknown
réf. DADAX0415425395New unknown
réf. DADAX041549754XNew unknown
réf. DADAX0415318599New unknown
réf. DADAX0415433320New unknown
réf. DADAX0367336243New unknown
réf. DADAX0415677866New unknown
réf. DADAX0415155258New unknown
réf. DADAX0415394910New unknown
réf. DADAX0415454905New unknown
réf. DADAX0415262151New unknown
réf. DADAX0415318068New unknown
réf. DADAX0415549817New unknown
réf. DADAX0415396069New unknown
2010réf. DADAX0521767067Cambridge University Press 2010-06-07. hardcover. New. 6.25x0.50x9.25. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Cambridge University Press hardcover
2014réf. x-1107051444Cambridge Univ Pr 2014. Hardcover. New. 450 pages. 9.75x6.50x1.00 inches. Cambridge Univ Pr hardcover
First Edition, [ii],46pp., title and last leaf a little dusty, disbound. "The quality of sugar formed no just basis for taxation. Such a system was inexpedient because it would encourage the production of low-grade product, particularly in the newly conquered colonies which were capable of supplying an almost unlimited quantity of the superior article. It would be impossible to grade sugars properly into the several classes according to which they would be taxed in the proposal under consideration. There would be much fraud to secure the benefit of low rates. Completely side-steps the great fact that it was not equitable to exact the same duty as formerly when sugar had declined to one-third of its one-time value."?Ragatz, p.281. Copac locates the Bodleian copy only; OCLC adds NHL & INU. Goldsmiths'-Kress no. 19403.3; Sabin,102848
Folio (440 x 280), 3, [1 blank]pp., drop-head title, items listed in 5 columns, numerous contemporary MS. additions, with horizontal folds, one or tow minor tears to folds and some light browning, but overall a very good copy. Reginald Whitley (c. 1754-1835) & Robert Osborn (c. 1783-1866) Nurserymen. Whitley was originally in partnership with Peter? Thoburn in a nursery in Cromwell Road, Kensington, 1788-96; Whitley and Barrit, 1796-1801; Whitley and Brames until 1810. Whitley, Brames and Milne acquired Burchell's Fulham Nursery in 1810; Whitley and Osborn from 1833. The business was continued by Osborn's sons William and Thomas. This catalogue is not listed in JISC or OCLC, however, it is noted in Desmond. Desmond, Dictionary of British & Irish Botanists, pp. 528 & 737.
réf. 15519A Paris, Chez la Veuve Saugrain, 1714. With royal coat-of-arms on title. (2), 43 pp. 4to. Sewn, contemporary marbled cover. Not in Kress; not in Goldsmiths; not in Bourgeois & André.
