544 results
1953ref. 18425Aoste, Imprimerie Valdôtaine, 1953 ; grand in-8, pleine basane havane, dos à nerfs décoré de motifs géométriques à froid, titre doré, premier plat décoré et doré, roulette dorée d'intérieur (reliure de l’éditeur) ; XXXII, 510, (6) pp., 36 illustrations dy compris le frontispice, dont 8 en couleurs.
1850ref. 823081850. Charleston: Steam-Power Press Walker & James 1850. Charleston: Steam-Power Press Walker & James 1850. Rare 1850 Pamphlet Proposing Reforms to South Carolina's Court System Courts. South Carolina. The Present Judiciary System of South-Carolina; Its Defects Reviewed and Modes Suggested for Its Improvement From the Southern Quarterly Review. Charleston: Steam-Power Press of Walker & James 1850. 24 pp. Octavo 8-3/4" x 5-1/2". Stab-stitched pamphlet in recent plain wrappers. Light toning light wear to outer corners of text block light foxing in places a few minor smudges to title page. $650. Only edition as a pamphlet. The author identified as "P" at the end of the text describes the deficiencies of South Carolina's court system mainly the small number of judges who are overworked. Because they are kept "at a sort of mill-horse progress round and round through incessant circuits" they have "little of the necessary leisure for research by which alone they can be enabled to keep pace with the progress of the profession" 4. As one would expect the main proposed solution is the appointment of more judges with a corresponding reorganization of the court system that would minimize circuit riding. OCLC locates 1 copy University of South Carolina. Sabin A Dictionary of Books Relating to America 87918. Cohen Bibliography of Early American Law 1048. unknown
1594ref. 727Lyon Povr les frères de Gabiano 1594 XX livres en 1 fort vol. in - 4 ( 23,5 x 17 cm ) ( poids :1,4 kg ) T. , (7) ff. n. ch. , 1156 pp. , (1) f.n. ch. . Contient :Table ; Extraict des actes et registres de la cour de la Séneschaucée de Lyon ; Livre I De l' ordre et estat ecclesiastique ; Livre II Des cours de Parlement & officiers d' icelles ; Livre III Des iuges ordinaires & autres ministres de iustice ; Livre IIII Des sièges présidiaux ; Livre V De l' instruction & reiglement des procez civils & ordre des procédures iudiciaires ; Livre VI De diverses matières décidées par les ordonnances ; Livre VII De l' infraction , des procès criminels & punition des crimes ; Livre VIII Des crimes & peines imposées à iceux ; Livre IX De l' exécution des jugemens & moyens de se pourueoir contre iceux ; Livre X De la police ; Livre XI Des vniuersitez & supposts d' icelles ; Livre XII De la chambre des comptes ; Livre XIII De la cour des aydes & officiers subiects à icelle ; Livre XIIII Des traictés , impositions , foraines & doüanes ; Livre XV Des monnoyes et officiers d' icelles ; Livre XVI Des eaves et forests & officiers d' icelles ; Livre XVII Du domaine et droicts de la couronne ; Livre XVIII De la maiorité des roys ; Livre XIX Des chanceliers de France ; Livre XX Des estats et offices & autres charges militaires ; colophon. Titre en rouge et noir , aux armes de France . Bandeaux , lettrines , culs-de-lampe . Plein vélin à petit recouvrement de l'époque . Traces de lacets . Notes manuscrites à l'encre à la première garde , au titre et à la dernière garde . Vélin rétréci . Nombreux cahiers décalés et l' un presque désolidarisé de l' ensemble. Travail de vers de la p.1090 à la fin , avec atteinte à plusieurs mots .
1774ref. 7572côté et paraphé par Nicolas François Gemeau, écuyer, Conseiller du Roi, Lieutenant général civil et criminel de Police en ladite Sénéchaussée. Manuscrit in-folio de 60 feuillets écrits et 6 blancs.
1889ref. 18721889 Edition Hachette, Paris, 1889-1890, 5 volumes demi-chagrin, couvertures conservées. (ix), 488; 502; 450; 455; 422 pages. 1) La Vendée. 2) L'Ouest et le Sud-Ouest. 3) Le Sud-Est, l'Est et la Région de Paris. 4) La Fontière du Nord et l'Alsace. 5) La Lorraine, le Nord et le Pas-de-Calais. Les Châtiments.
1999ref. 2-904111212XMartinus Nijhoff 1999. Hardcover. New. 1st edition. 657 pages. 9.25x6.50x1.25 inches. Martinus Nijhoff hardcover
1838ref. 865271838. A Glimpse into the Operation of a Venerable Hundred Court During the Mid-Nineteenth Century Archive. Courts Great Britain. Documents Concerning the Salford Hundred Court. Salford England 1838-1868. 12 documents: 2 jury lists 4 jury summonses 2 broadside notifications of court sessions 2 receipts 1 manuscript letter 1 envelope of another letter with manuscript note. Printed and manuscript leaves bifolia and an envelope manuscript additions to printed items sizes range from 2-3/4" x 4-3/4" to 11" x 8-1/2" 5.7 x 12 to 27.9 x 21.6 cm. Moderate toning fold lines occasional edgewear and light soiling but all items are well-preserved and written or annotated in legible hands. $750. Established in 1436 this institution-known officially as the Court Leet View of Frankpledge and Court of Record of our Sovereign Lord the King for his Hundred or Wapentake of Salford-was remarkably resilient. While most ancient hundred courts faded into obscurity the Salford court survived via various jurisdictional modifications well into the twentieth century before it was formally abolished in 1971. Administered by the Hereditary Steward of the Earls of Sefton its jurisdiction covered an area that today comprises part of Greater Manchester. Our archive dates from a period when the court's scope had been restricted primarily to lower-level personal actions functioning much like a modern American small claims court. Together they offer an intimate granular look at the mechanics of mid-nineteenth-century English local justice. It consists of: Jury Lists & Summonses: Focusing on the Township of Pendleton Salford the two jury lists detail local men who based on strict property requirements were deemed eligible or ineligible to serve. Steward's Letter: A manuscript letter dated December 31 1838 written by William Eaton Hall Steward of the Earl of Sefton to the local law firm of Hulme and Andrews. On the Earl's behalf Hall inquires if the firm would be willing to assume the management of the court. Annotated Envelope: Postmarked October 19 1862 this envelope bears a detailed manuscript note indicating that the enclosed letter now lost was a request from a local citizen begging to be dismissed from jury duty. Broadsides and Receipts: the broadsides describe upcoming court sessions; the receipts reco. unknown
2007ref. 549552007. North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports. Raleigh NC: Administrative Office of the Courts. Vols. 1-180 1968-2007. Ex-private law library very good. See digital image. $795. unknown books
ref. 7573In-4 de 162 ff. manuscrits recto-verso.
1757ref. 483150London In the Savoy : Printed by Henry Lintot for T. Osborne and J. Shipton 1757. Fourth Edition. Hardcover. Very good copies from the 4th edition 1757 Vols. 1 and 3-5 in full contemporary aniline calf boards now somewhat scuffed and dust-dulled. Corners bumped with panel edges lightly worn. Spines with raised bands and gilt-tooled leather labels the former rubbed along with joints and endbands. Vol. 2 from the 3rd edition 1725 is in good condition: more heavily worn at the endbands with some surface loss to the boards and lacking spine labels. All text blocks remain strong and clean showing only the expected light foxing and offsetting of age. A well-preserved set overall. Provenance; Bookplate of Jo Lavender. Further scans images and additional bibliographical material available on request. Physical description; 5 volumes ; 32 cm. Notes; Vols. 1-5 of 7. Mixed editions. Contains two tables: of case names and of special matter. Subjects; Law reports. Great Britain. King's Bench. Chancery. Common Pleas. Exchequer. [London] In the Savoy : Printed by Henry Lintot for T. Osborne and J. Shipton hardcover
1802ref. WRCAM24229Albany: Printed for Collier and Stockwell 1802. 796pp. Contemporary calf morocco label stamped in gilt. Calf scuffed and worn front hinge cracking rear hinge tender. Light even tanning; foxing. Good. An important - and possibly the most extensive - record of Congressional debates concerning the nature of the Judiciary and its establishment as an independent branch of the government in the wake of the Judiciary Act of 1801. Two versions of these debates were printed in 1802: one in Philadelphia; and the present Albany New York version which bears imprints by two different sets of printers. This Albany version differs from the Philadelphia printing in that it includes both the Senate and House debates. It also appears to have been edited from a pro- Jeffersonian viewpoint mentioning in the preface that the "judicial power has armed itself in defence of its own supposed rights and independence." The election of 1800 represented the end of Federalist control of the Executive branch after twelve years. On the eve of Jefferson's inauguration President Adams nominated and the Senate confirmed John Marshall as chief justice of the Supreme Court. In addition Congress quickly passed a law reducing the number of Supreme Court justices to five took away their Circuit Court duties and reorganized the Circuit Courts with sixteen new justices all of whom were nominated and confirmed just weeks prior to the inauguration. The intention was to keep the Judiciary as an adjunct of the Federalists. The Federalists waited about a year to organize and one of the first measures introduced in the Senate in 1802 was a repeal of the Act of 1801 at Jefferson's insistence. The Senate deadlocked and Vice President Burr cast the deciding vote against the measure but the act was repealed after a subsequent vote. The Supreme Court went back to having six justices all of whom headed one of six U.S. Circuit Courts. Repeal of the 1801 Judiciary Act helped reduce Democrat-Republican influence in the U.S. courts; but as with so many triumphs this victory came with an unanticipated result: one minor aspect of the 1801 Act was the appointment by the President of the justices of the peace for Washington and Alexandria. On March 2 Adams nominated and the next day the Senate confirmed forty-two justices but four of the commissions had not been delivered by midnight when Adams' term expired. One of these was to William Marbury who sued after Jefferson ordered Secretary of State Madison to withhold the commission. The case went to the Supreme Court in 1803 where Marbury lost primarily because the Court had just emerged from the Federalist-Democrat-Republican political thicket and a new struggle with the executive branch was to be avoided. However the case also included a hidden doorway through which Marshall hustled to declare the independence of the Judiciary from the blatant partisanship of recent years and claim its equality with the other two branches of government. In addition the Court ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which authorized such a writ was contrary to the Constitution and therefore invalid. It was the first time the Supreme Court declared a law of Congress void but this was a power the Court itself possessed with the greatest timidity. This was the only case while Marshall was chief justice in which the Court specifically reversed an Act of Congress. The concept would not be employed again by the full court until the Dred Scott decision fifty-four years later. COHEN 1203. SHAW & SHOEMAKER 3271. SABIN 19101 variant imprint. Printed for Collier and Stockwell unknown books
1802ref. 24229Albany: Printed for Collier and Stockwell 1802. Arranging the United States Judiciary An important - and possibly the most extensive - record of Congressional debates concerning the nature of the Judiciary and its establishment as an independent branch of the government in the wake of the Judiciary Act of 1801. Two versions of these debates were printed in 1802: one in Philadelphia; and the present Albany New York version which bears imprints by two different sets of printers. This Albany version differs from the Philadelphia printing in that it includes both the Senate and House debates. It also appears to have been edited from a pro-Jeffersonian viewpoint mentioning in the preface that the "judicial power has armed itself in defence of its own supposed rights and independence." The election of 1800 represented the end of Federalist control of the Executive branch after twelve years. On the eve of Jefferson's inauguration President Adams nominated and the Senate confirmed John Marshall as chief justice of the Supreme Court. In addition Congress quickly passed a law reducing the number of Supreme Court justices to five took away their Circuit Court duties and reorganized the Circuit Courts with sixteen new justices all of whom were nominated and confirmed just weeks prior to the inauguration. The intention was to keep the Judiciary as an adjunct of the Federalists. The Federalists waited about a year to organize and one of the first measures introduced in the Senate in 1802 was a repeal of the Act of 1801 at Jefferson's insistence. The Senate deadlocked and Vice President Burr cast the deciding vote against the measure but the act was repealed after a subsequent vote. The Supreme Court went back to having six justices all of whom headed one of six U.S. Circuit Courts. Repeal of the 1801 Judiciary Act helped reduce Democrat-Republican influence in the U.S. courts; but as with so many triumphs this victory came with an unanticipated result: one minor aspect of the 1801 Act was the appointment by the President of the justices of the peace for Washington and Alexandria. On March 2 Adams nominated and the next day the Senate confirmed forty-two justices but four of the commissions had not been delivered by midnight when Adams' term expired. One of these was to William Marbury who sued after Jefferson ordered Secretary of State Madison to withhold the commission. The case went to the Supreme Court in 1803 where Marbury lost primarily because the Court had just emerged from the Federalist-Democrat-Republican political thicket and a new struggle with the executive branch was to be avoided. However the case also included a hidden doorway through which Marshall hustled to declare the independence of the Judiciary from the blatant partisanship of recent years and claim its equality with the other two branches of government. In addition the Court ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which authorized such a writ was contrary to the Constitution and therefore invalid. It was the first time the Supreme Court declared a law of Congress void but this was a power the Court itself possessed with the greatest timidity. This was the only case while Marshall was chief justice in which the Court specifically reversed an Act of Congress. The concept would not be employed again by the full court until the Dred Scott decision fifty-four years later. Contemporary calf morocco label stamped in gilt. Calf scuffed and worn front hinge cracking rear hinge tender. Light even tanning; foxing. Good. COHEN 1203. SHAW & SHOEMAKER 3271. SABIN 19101 variant imprint. unknown
1802ref. WRCAM32306Philadelphia 1802. 2324pp. Half title. Contemporary three-quarter morocco and marbled boards spine gilt leather label. Some scattered foxing lightly toned. About very good. An important record of the evolution of American law and the development of judicial independence in the early republic. This is one of two printings of the debates over the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801. This version is edited from a Federalist perspective with critical comments on the debates as recorded in the NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER an organ of the Jeffersonian Republicans. The debate over the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801 addressed issues of judicial review and the role size and authority of the judiciary branch issues which led ultimately to the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison. The 1801 act passed by a Federalist Congress reduced the number of Supreme Court justices from six to five created new circuits and allowed outgoing President John Adams to appoint several new federal judges the so-called "midnight judges." Jefferson opposed the 1801 act and though it was overturned by the Judiciary Act of 1802 the federal judiciary remained fundamentally unaltered. The Marbury v. Madison decision of 1803 solidified the notion of judicial review of legislation and elevated the Supreme Court to a level of equality with the executive and legislative branches. A vital document exemplifying the debates over the judiciary in the Federalist era and emblematic of the political skirmishes of the day. COHEN 1058. SABIN 19105. SHAW & SHOEMAKER 3273. OXFORD COMPANION TO THE SUPREME COURT pp.474- 75. hardcover books
1802ref. 32306Philadelphia: for E. Bronson 1802. The Crucial Debates over the Judiciary Act of 1802 An important record of the evolution of American law and the development of judicial independence in the early republic. This is one of two printings of the debates over the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801. This version is edited from a Federalist perspective with critical comments on the debates as recorded in the NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER an organ of the Jeffersonian Republicans. The debate over the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801 addressed issues of judicial review and the role size and authority of the judiciary branch issues which led ultimately to the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison. The 1801 act passed by a Federalist Congress reduced the number of Supreme Court justices from six to five created new circuits and allowed outgoing President John Adams to appoint several new federal judges the so-called "midnight judges." Jefferson opposed the 1801 act and though it was overturned by the Judiciary Act of 1802 the federal judiciary remained fundamentally unaltered. The Marbury v. Madison decision of 1803 solidified the notion of judicial review of legislation and elevated the Supreme Court to a level of equality with the executive and legislative branches. A vital document exemplifying the debates over the judiciary in the Federalist era and emblematic of the political skirmishes of the day. 2324pp. Half title. Contemporary three-quarter morocco and marbled boards spine gilt leather label. Some scattered foxing lightly toned. About very good. COHEN 1058. SABIN 19105. SHAW & SHOEMAKER 3273. OXFORD COMPANION TO THE SUPREME COURT pp.474-75. hardcover
Nine volumes in one. Folio. 350 mm. Collation: Engraved title, 10 leaves (the last blank), 62 p. ; 4 leaves (the first blank), pp. 63-94; 9 leaves (the first blank), pp. 95-200; 19 leaves (the first blank), pp. 201-406; 7 leaves , pp. 407-443; 22 leaves, pp. 444-728; 4 leaves, pp. 729-774; 3 leaves (the first blank), pp. 775-793; 4 leaves, pp. 794-827, 6 leaves. Scattered damp stain, heaviest on last leaf (colophon). Early thumb indexes mostly present. German black letter gothic fraktur type; large woodcut initials; and decorative head and tail pieces throughout. Each sectional title bears Maximilian's large (150 x 185 mm) coat of arms. Most impressive too are the six pages with large woodcuts of 10 fish and one lobster. Generally clean and tight. Original full alum tawed pigskin over beveled oak boards binding; nicely tooled in blind; with Maximillian's simple arms, in a circle, within a 2" diamond. Five raised bands. Original brass clasps present. Early manuscript ownerships; Printed paper ownerships of the Kgl. Bezirksgericht Nurnberg in various places. Several stamped Nazi Eagle ownerships of the Oberlandesgerichts Nurnberg. First Edition of the Codex Maximilianus. Bavaria, under Maximilian I (1598-1651), was a country of around 1 million inhabitants, with agriculture and salt production (a ducal monopoly) being the dominant sectors of the economy. It became a key player in the events leading up to the Thirty Years War. In 1608, Bavaria occupied and annexed the hitherto free Imperial and Lutheran city of Donauworth. The action caused the Protestant princes and cities to found the Protestant Union. Bavaria then concluded an alliance with the Austrian and Hungarian Estates. In 1609 Bavaria became the leading force in the newly founded (Catholic) Holy League, an alliance formed against the Protestant Union. Consolidating his governance, Duke Maximilian, in 1616 introduced a new Bavarian Landrecht (Law Code), which was a compilation, reworking, and summation of all the laws and codes. Includes the codes of: Judicial Procedure; Court Laws; State Laws; Police Law; Forestry, hunting, and fishing regulations; Etc. It became a widespread the model for law and legislation for over 150 years. Stobbe II, 366. Very Scarce. Only a handful of copies are recorded in U.S. libraries. **PRICE JUST REDUCED! CHEST 2/1
1559ref. 717111559. London 1559. London 1559. "The Booke That Teacheth" Great Britain. Justices of the Peace. Courts Leet and Baron. The Contentes of This Boke. Fyrst the Booke for a Iustice of Peace. The Boke that Teacheth to Kepe a Courte Baron Or a Lete. The Boke Teachynge to Kepe a Courte Hundred. The Boke Called Returna Brevium. The Boke Called Carta Feodi Conteynynge the Forme of Dedes Releasses Indentures Obligacions Acquitaunces Letters of Atturney Letters of Permutacion Testamentes And Other Thynges. And the Boke of the Ordinaunce to be Observed by the Offycers of the Kynges Escheker for Fees Takinge. London: In Fletestreete within Temple barre At the Signe of the Hande and Starre by Richard Tottil The XIII. Daye of Maye. Anno Domini 1559. 195 11 ff. Lacking Final two blank leaves. Octavo 5-1/4" x 3-1/2". Recent period-style calf blind rules to boards raised bands to spine endpapers renewed blank interleaves added in a few places. Moderate toning edges trimmed touching headlines in a few places worming with occasional minor loss to text repairs to corners of a few leaves. Faint stain and faint fragment of an annotation to final leaf early illegible owner signatures to title page. $2500. First printed in 1505 by Richard Pynson this is a handy anthology of treatises for justices of the peace sheriffs bailiffs. It includes the Carta Foedi and exchequer ordinance. It is sometime attributed erroneously to Sir Anthony Fitzherbert. OCLC locates 5 copies of this edition in North American law libraries Columbia Harvard LA County Library of Congress University of Minnesota. English Short-Title Catalogue S102175. Beale A Bibliography of Early English Law Books T154. unknown books
1746ref. 217802London: Various publishers 1746. Mostly first editions unless otherwise noted below. 1 vols. 8vo. Contemporary calf backed marbled boards. Binding worn internally clean. Mostly first editions unless otherwise noted below. 1 vols. 8vo. Courts Martial of Mathews and Lestock. A good single collection relating to the trials of Admirals Mathews and Lestock which resulted from their engagement with the French and Spanish fleet near Toulon in February 1744. The battle part of the War of the Austrian Succession is said to have "marked the lowest pitch reached in discipline and fighting and efficiency by the fleet in the 18th century and it had a very bad effect in confirming the pedantic system of tactics set up by the old Fighting Instructions . " - Encyclopedia Britannica 11th ed. To the puzzlement of many contemporary observors Rear-Admiral Richard Lestock who was second in command and who kept his distance from the battle was acquitted. In contrast Vice-Admiral Thomas Mathews who engaged the enemy however confusedly was censured and was one of seven ship-captains to be discharged from the service. A hand-written table of contents on the front free flyleaf gives a list of the contents amended in pencil by a later hand. 1. Corbett Thomas. An account of the expedition of the British fleet to Sicily in the years 1718 1719 and 1720. Under the command of Sir George Byng Bart. . Collected from the Admiral's manuscripts and other original papers. With folding table. For J. and R. tonson 1739. Third edition. Lacking final leaf pp. 95-96. Sir George Byng the naval hero was the father of Admiral John Byng who presided over the cout martial of Lestock and was himself court-martialed and executed a few years later. ESTC T 142387. 2. Mathews Thomas. Authentick letters from Admiral Mathews to the Sec--t----s of st--te the L----ds of the Ad------ty &c. Relating to his expedition to the Mediterranean with their answers . 2 5-29 29-30 30-68 pp. Printed for W. Webb. Title leaf detached. ESTC T 22798. 3. Mathews Thomas. Admiral Mathews's conduct in the late engagement vindicated. Wherein the whole affair is compendiously stated. The several pieces published by Mr. Lestock examined with candor. . By a gentleman of the Royal Navy. For M. Cooper 1745. Lacking half-title. ESTC T 115878 4. Mathews Thomas. The Charge of Thomas Mathews Esq; also the answer and defence of Admiral Mathews to the said charge &c. For E. Cooper n.d. `746. ESTC T 182897. 5. Lestock Richard. Vice-Adm--l L-st-k's Account of the Late Engagement near Toulon between His Majesty's fleet and the fleets of France and Spain : as presented by him the 12th of March 1744-5 : also letters to and from Adm---l L-st--k relating thereto since his arrival in England with notes. London: for M. Cooper 1745. ESTCT4221. 6. Lestock Richard. Vice-Admal Lestock's recapitulation as spoke by him at the Bar of the Honble House of Commons on Tuesday the 9th of April 1745. Containing his remarks on the evidence that have been examined . printed for John Millan 1745. ESTC T 177090. 7. Lestock Richard. The sentence pronounc'd by the Court-martial sitting aboard His Majesty's Ship the Prince of Orange at Deptford on Tuesday the 3d of June 1746 on Vice-Admiral Lestock. printed for M. Cooper 1746. ESTC T 47456. Provenance: Philip.C. Duschnes; Paul Peralta-Ramos with stamp Various publishers unknown books
1746ref. 217802London: Various publishers 1746. Mostly first editions unless otherwise noted below. 1 vols. 8vo. Contemporary calf backed marbled boards. Binding worn internally clean. Mostly first editions unless otherwise noted below. 1 vols. 8vo. A good single collection relating to the trials of Admirals Mathews and Lestock which resulted from their engagement with the French and Spanish fleet near Toulon in February 1744. The battle part of the War of the Austrian Succession is said to have "marked the lowest pitch reached in discipline and fighting and efficiency by the fleet in the 18th century and it had a very bad effect in confirming the pedantic system of tactics set up by the old Fighting Instructions . " - Encyclopedia Britannica 11th ed. To the puzzlement of many contemporary observors Rear-Admiral Richard Lestock who was second in command and who kept his distance from the battle was acquitted. In contrast Vice-Admiral Thomas Mathews who engaged the enemy however confusedly was censured and was one of seven ship-captains to be discharged from the service. A hand-written table of contents on the front free flyleaf gives a list of the contents amended in pencil by a later hand. 1. Corbett Thomas. An account of the expedition of the British fleet to Sicily in the years 1718 1719 and 1720. Under the command of Sir George Byng Bart. . Collected from the Admiral's manuscripts and other original papers. With folding table. For J. and R. tonson 1739. Third edition. Lacking final leaf pp. 95-96. Sir George Byng the naval hero was the father of Admiral John Byng who presided over the cout martial of Lestock and was himself court-martialed and executed a few years later. ESTC T 142387. 2. Mathews Thomas. Authentick letters from Admiral Mathews to the Sec--t----s of st--te the L----ds of the Ad------ty &c. Relating to his expedition to the Mediterranean with their answers . 2 5-29 29-30 30-68 pp. Printed for W. Webb. Title leaf detached. ESTC T 22798. 3. Mathews Thomas. Admiral Mathews's conduct in the late engagement vindicated. Wherein the whole affair is compendiously stated. The several pieces published by Mr. Lestock examined with candor. . By a gentleman of the Royal Navy. For M. Cooper 1745. Lacking half-title. ESTC T 115878 4. Mathews Thomas. The Charge of Thomas Mathews Esq; also the answer and defence of Admiral Mathews to the said charge &c. For E. Cooper n.d. `746. ESTC T 182897. 5. Lestock Richard. Vice-Adm--l L-st-k's Account of the Late Engagement near Toulon between His Majesty's fleet and the fleets of France and Spain : as presented by him the 12th of March 1744-5 : also letters to and from Adm---l L-st--k relating thereto since his arrival in England with notes. London: for M. Cooper 1745. ESTCT4221. 6. Lestock Richard. Vice-Admal Lestock's recapitulation as spoke by him at the Bar of the Honble House of Commons on Tuesday the 9th of April 1745. Containing his remarks on the evidence that have been examined . printed for John Millan 1745. ESTC T 177090. 7. Lestock Richard. The sentence pronounc'd by the Court-martial sitting aboard His Majesty's Ship the Prince of Orange at Deptford on Tuesday the 3d of June 1746 on Vice-Admiral Lestock. printed for M. Cooper 1746. ESTC T 47456. Provenance: Philip.C. Duschnes; Paul Peralta-Ramos with stamp Various publishers unknown
1897ref. PHO-2007Paris, fontemoing, 1897-1905, 7 volumes in-8, relié demi chagrin, dos à nerfs avec auteur, titre et tomaison, frottements aux charnières, ex-dono de l’auteur à « Mon cher collègue et ami, Mr Jobbé Duval ». Bon exemplaire