1.428 resultados
1985ref. 62509Washington DC: United States 1985. Presumed first edition/first printing. Wraps. Good. No dust jacket as issued. Paperclip mark on front and first page noted. Cover has some wear and soiling. 3 x 15 p. The appendices were in separate volumes at least two were classified and are not present. William Clark was the Chairman of the Blue Ribbon Task Group. This report was submitted in compliance with Section 1632 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act 1985 Public Law 98-525 and Executive Order 12499 of January 18 1985. The Task Group addressed procedures used by the Departments of Defense and Energy in establishing requirements and providing resources for the research development testing production surveillance and retirement of nuclear weapons. Members of the Task Group included James Schlesinger Former Secretary of Energy and Defense Former Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission Harold Agnew former Director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Jeane Kirkpatrick Former Ambassador to the United Nations and William Perry Former Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. United States paperback
2008ref. 65325Washington DC: United States Department of Defense 2008. Presumed first edition/first printing. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket as issued. Includes illustrations. Various paginations 84 pages. Footnotes. Serious incidents in 2006 and 2007 alerted the Department of Defense to the Air Force's mishandling of nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons-related material. In June 2008 Secretary fo Defense Robert Gates appointed a Task Force on Nuclear Weapons Management to recommend necessary improvements and measures to enhance deterrence and international confidence in the U.S. nuclear deterrent. This report was stated as being the first of two from the Task Force. United States, Department of Defense paperback
2005ref. 68273Washington DC: United States Department of Energy 2005. Presumed first edition/first printing. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket. Cover has slight wear and soiling. 91 1 p. Includes diagrams. Tables. Abbreviations and Acronyms. Recommendations. Appendices. The joint review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory cleanup program was conducted in early 2005. The team was staffed by members of the Office of Environmental Management and the National Nuclear Security Administration. The purpose of the review was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the scope of work for the LANL environmental cleanup program against the requirements of the New Mexico Environment Department NMED Consent Order the US Environment Protection Agency Federal Facility Compliance Act and other requirements. In particular the review evaluated the then currently planned scope as well as potential new scope to ensure it was well understood; that associated cost estimates and schedules were based on reasonable assumptions and approaches to work planning and execution and that the projects were being developed and managed in accordance with the requirements of DOE Order 413 for project management. United States Department of Energy paperback
1985ref. 65889Washington DC: National Academies Press 1985. Presumed first edition/first printing. Trade paperback. Good. No dust jacket as issued. Ex-library. Usual library markings. COver has some wear and soiling. ix 1 . 193 1 p. References. Diagrams. Maps. Illustrations. Index. Most of the earth's population would survive the immediate horrors of a nuclear holocaust but what long-term climatological changes would affect their ability to secure food and shelter This sobering book considers the effects of fine dust from ground-level detonations of smoke from widespread fires and of chemicals released into the atmosphere. The authors use mathematical models of atmospheric processes and data from natural situations-e.g. volcanic eruptions and arctic haze-to draw their conclusions. This is the most detailed and comprehensive probe of the scientific evidence published to date. National Academies Press paperback
2008ref. 66303Washington DC: United States. Department of Defense 2008. 2008 Edition. Presumed first printing thus. Wraps. Very good. x 258 p. Includes: illustrations index. With CD. Some illustrations in color. Glossary. Acronym List. Reference List. The information contained herein was current as of October 2007. Nuclear Matters is the DoD focal point for the modernization and sustainment of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile as well as for a wide range of nuclear counterterrorism and counterproliferation issues. Nuclear Matters is responsible for leading and integrating interagency efforts to ensure the continued credibility of the U.S. nuclear deterrent. Its Mission is To ensure the continued credibility effectiveness safety and security of the U.S. deterrent in order to deter nuclear and non-nuclear attack; assure U.S. allies and partners; achieve U.S. objectives if deterrence fails; and hedge against an uncertain future. This guide to Nuclear Matters can be read cover-to-cover for those who seek to understand the Program in its entirety and can also be used as a reference source to look up useful facts and information concerning specific areas. The CD-ROM is searchable and contains the book's complete text and a comprehensive reference library of unclassified source documents related to the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program. This guide is unofficial although every effort had been made to ensure that it is accurate and comprehensive. United States. Department of Defense paperback
1961ref. 59628Oak Ridge TN: Union Carbide Nuclear Company 1961. Presumed First Edition First printing thus. Wraps. Good. No dust jacket. vi 80 pages. Highlighting/underlining. Name of previous owner present. Ink notation on front cover. Cover has some wear and soiling. Underlining noted at one line of text. Report Number KOA-888. Marked UNCLASSIFIED. Prepared for the Atomic Energy Commission under U. S. Government Contract W7405 eng 26. There are mathematical formulae and a large number of numerical values presented. There is only a limited amount of text. K-25 was the codename given by the Manhattan Project during World War II for the project to produce enriched uranium for atomic bombs using the gaseous diffusion method. Over time it came to refer to the production facility located at the Clinton Engineer Works in Oak Ridge Tennessee the main gaseous diffusion building and ultimately the site. When it was built in 1944 the four-story K-25 gaseous diffusion plant was the world's largest building with over 1640000 square feet of floor space and a volume of 97500000 cubic feet . The highly corrosive uranium hexafluoride UF6 was the only known compound of uranium sufficiently volatile to be used in this process. Slightly enriched product from the S-50 thermal diffusion plant was fed into the K-25 gaseous diffusion plant. The enriched uranium was used in the Little Boy atomic bomb used in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. In 1946 the K-25 gaseous diffusion plant became capable of producing highly enriched product. After the war four more gaseous diffusion plants were added to the site named K-27 K-29 K-31 and K-33. The K-25 site was renamed the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant in 1955. Production of enriched uranium ended in 1964. Union Carbide Nuclear Company paperback
1979ref. 69168Washington DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1979. Presumed first edition/first printing. Wraps. Good. Cover has some sunning/fading. Interior is very good. Various paginations approximately 300 pages. Illustrations. Diagrams. Maps. References. The NRC Authorization Bill for Fiscal 1979 directed the NRC to conduct a study of extending the Commisson's licensing or regulatory authority to include categories of existing and future Federal radioactive waste storage and disposal activities not presently subject to such authority. The report includes a complete listing and inventory of all radioactive waste storage and disposal activities now being conducted or planned by Federal agencies. The NRC study has attempted to present a general comparison of the relative hazards associated with defense-generated and commercial wastes. Options for extending the Commission authority were developed and analyzed. The implications of NEPA were analyzed in the context of these options. The national security implications of extending NRC's regulatory authority voer DOE programs are examined and evaluated. Costs and benefits are identified and assessed. The Commission's recommendations based on the study are to extend licensing authority over new DOE disposal activities involving transuranic wastes and non-defense low-level waste and to initiate a pilot program to test the feasibility of NRC playing a consultative role in the evaluation of existing DOE activities. Nuclear Regulatory Commission paperback
1999ref. 70684Washington DC: United States. Department of Defense 1999. First Edition stated. Presumed First Printing. Trade paperback. Very good. xviii 62 pages. Includes: Illustrations Diagrams. Acronyms and Abbreviations. Cover has slight wear and soiling. Nuclear weapons life extension and countering nuclear threats will continue to be a central concern for the United States and the Department of Defense. The Department has identified the dual missions of sustaining a safe secure and effective nuclear deterrent and countering the threat from nuclear terrorism and nuclear proliferation as among the most important for U.S. national security priorities. Nuclear Matters serves as the focal point for these missions within the Department of Defense. "To deter nuclear war and serve as last resort weapons of self-defense. In this sense U.S. nuclear weapons are fundamental to our nation's security and have historically provided a deterrent against aggression and security assurance to U.S. allies. A robust flexible and survivable U.S. nuclear arsenal underpins the U.S. ability to deploy conventional forces worldwide; provides the Commander-in-Chief with credible response options to strengthen deterrence; and supports U.S. nonproliferation goals by extending deterrence to allies thereby dissuading them from developing their own nuclear weapons." Secretary of Defense Mattis at his confirmation hearing January 2017 This was intended to be a basic reference on the nuclear hardening of military systems. This Guidebook was not intended to be a definitive document on the effects of nuclear weapons or a "how to" guide for Project Managers but rather it provides information to staff officers who require a basic understanding of nuclear hardening as it relates to the acquisition of nuclear survivable systems. The information is this Guidebook was current as of September 1999. Nuclear weapon system survivability is concerned with the ability of U.S. nuclear deterrent forces to survive against the entire threat spectrum that includes but is not limited to nuclear weapon effects. The vast range of potential threats include: · conventional and electronic weaponry; · nuclear biological and chemical weapons; · advanced technology weapons such as high-power microwaves and radio frequency weapons; · terrorism or sabotage; and · the initial effects of a nuclear detonation. Put simply nuclear weapon effects survivability refers to the ability of any and all personnel equipment and systems including but not limited to nuclear systems to survive nuclear weapon effects. Nuclear weapon system survivability refers to nuclear weapon systems being survivable against any threat including but not limited to the nuclear threat. Nuclear hardness describes the ability of a system to withstand the effects of a nuclear detonation and to avoid internal malfunction or performance degradation. Hardness measures the ability of a system's hardware to withstand physical effects such as overpressure peak velocities energy absorbed and electrical stress. This reduction in hardware vulnerability can be achieved through a variety of well-established design specifications or through the selection of well-built and well-engineered components. This appendix does not address residual nuclear weapon effects such as fallout nor does it discuss nuclear contamination survivability. United States. Department of Defense paperback
1996ref. 59760Washington DC: Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Task Team 1996. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket. 92 p. Includes: illustrations diagrams. Volume I ONLY. Prepared for The Department of Energy Office of Spent Fuel Management. During the six-month period from November 1995 through April 1996 the Task Team examined the wide-ranging technical issues attendant to achieving safe and cost-effective dispost of the aluminium-based spent nuclear fuel under DOE's jurisdiction. This fuel is from research and test reactors. This report offers a path forward. Volume I provides a technical synopsis of the fuel in question and the issues involved and summarized the Team's evaluations findings and recommendations to DOE. Volume II is a compendium of supporting technical information. Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Task Team paperback
1993ref. 67195Washington DC: United States. Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program 1993. Presumed first edition/first printing. Wraps. Good. iii 39 24 p. Includes diagrams. The environmental effect of disposal of radioactive wastes originating from U.S. Naval nuclear propulsion plants and their support facilities is assessed. This report confirms that procedures used by the Navy to control releases of reaidactivity from U.S. Naval nuclear-powered ships and their support facilities are effective in protecting the environment and the health and safety of the general public. United States. Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program paperback
1996ref. 68604Washington DC: United States Department of Defense 1996. Presumed first edition/first printing thus. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket. Has slight wear and soiling. Tape bound. Various paginations approximately 125 pages. Figures. Acronyms. Chronology. The purpose of this Stockpile Management Information Handbook was to provide an overview of the Department of Defense DoD0 Acquisition Management System AMS; key organizations in that process; the joint nuclear weapons life cycle process between the DoD and the Department of Energy DOE; DOER organizations and production facilities; the documents used in the US nuclear weapons stockpile management process; and important events in the history of nuclear weapons. This handbook was intended to be both a training tool for persons without previous experience in the development acquisition and stockpile management of nuclear weapons as well as a reference book for persons on the job. This handbook was not intended to be a comprehensive reference source for program managers. United States Department of Defense paperback
1989ref. 65251National Academies Press 1989. Trade paperback. Very good. No dust jacket as issued. References. Abbreviations. x 146 p. In this volume the National Research Council examines problems arising throughout government-owned contractor-operated facilities in the United States engaged in activities to build nuclear weapons. The book draws conclusions about and makes recommendations for the health and safety of the nuclear weapons complex and addresses pressing environmental concerns. In addition the book examines the future of the complex and offers suggestions for its modernization. Several explanatory appendixes provide useful background information on the functioning of the complex criticality safety plutonium chemistry and weapons physics. In the aftermath of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station the Department of energy DOE asked the National Research Council to examine possible implications of the accident for the large reactors operated by the Department. The reactors included those then operating at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina and at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in the state of Washington. In response the National Research Council issued reports in 1987 and 1988 that focused on a variety of safety management and technical issues. In the meantime concerns developed with regard to the other nonreactor facilities in the nuclear weapons complex. As a result of these concerns Congress directed the Secretary of Energy to request that the National Research Concil report its conclusions and recommendations concerning health safety and environmental issues arising throughout the complex and steps that would enhance the safety of operations at the facilties. This report fulfills the Secretary's request. National Academies Press paperback
1983ref. 54539Los Alamos NM: Los Alamos National Lab 1983. very good. 3-ring binder approximately 2 inches of material. Course met from October 17 to November 4 1983. Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. The course director was Charles R. Hatcher. Los Alamos National Lab unknown
1978ref. 49270Washington DC: GPO 1978. very good. 65 wraps figures appendix. H.A.S.C. No. 95-95. Topics covered include conclusions of the Panel SALT II status unresolved SALT II issues United States-Soviet Strategic Trends U.S. strategic requirements unilateral arms restraint and SALT II: no cause of euphoria. GPO paperback
ref. 6246Livermore CA: Lawrence Radiation Lab n.d. good. 1 photo color photo approx. 19-3/4" x 15" mounted on board approx. 24-1/4" x 20" Lawrence Radiation Lab unknown
1981ref. 41371Washington DC: GPO 1981. First Edition. First Printing. good. Quarto approx. 325 wraps sections index tabbed tabs bent references fr cover stained and edge creased spine faded slight waviness to text. NUREG-0740. GPO paperback
1999ref. 46443Washington DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm 1999. First Edition. First Printing. good. Approx. 100 wraps abbreviations chronology of correspondence glossary label with previous owner's name partially removed from fr cover. Covers somewhat worn and soiled distribution letter laid in. NUREG-1672. Project No. 697. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm paperback
1997ref. 47957Arlington VA: Nuclear Waste Technical Bd 1997. First Edition. First Printing. very good. Approx. 100 wraps references glossary. This report was submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 Public Law 100-123. It presents findings and recommendations. Congress created the Board to evaluate the technical and scientific validity of the Department of Energy's program to manage the permanent disposition of the nation's civilian spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Specifically the Board is charged with evaluating the DOE site-characterization activities at Yucca Mountain Nevada as well as activities relating to the design of the repository and to the packaging and transport of spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Nuclear Waste Technical Bd paperback
1988ref. 51088Washington DC: GPO 1988. very good. 148 wraps figures tables references index. Complete subtitle: Hearing on National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1988/1989--H.R. 1748 and Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Department of Energy National Security Programs. H.A.S.C. No. 100-13. GPO paperback
1978ref. 45407Washington DC: GPO 1978. First Edition. First Printing. good. 24 cm 146 wraps. H.A.S.C. No. 95-62. GPO paperback
1978ref. 50266Washington DC: GPO 1978. First Edition. First Printing. good. 24 cm 60 wraps table. H.A.S.C. No. 95-99. Hearings before the Panel on Indian Ocean Forces Limitation and Conventional Arms Transfer Limitation of the Intelligence and Military Application of Nuclear Energy Subcommittee. Sonny Montgomery was the panel chairperson. There are several places where text has been omitted presumably for classification/security reasons and the deletion noted. GPO paperback
1964ref. 11228Livermore CA: Lawrence Radiation Laboratory c. 1964. Presumed first iteration thus. Photograph. good. 1 photo color photo approx. 20" x 16" mounted on board 24" x 20" some soiling to board and some wear along edges. Peaceful nuclear explosions PNEs are nuclear explosions conducted for non-military purposes such as activities related to economic development including the creation of canals. During the 1960s and 1970s both the United States and the Soviet Union conducted a number of PNEs. Six of the explosions by the Soviet Union are considered to have been of an applied nature not just tests. Subsequently the United States and the Soviet Union halted their programs. Definitions and limits are covered in the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976. In the PNE Treaty the signatories agreed: not to carry out any individual nuclear explosions having a yield exceeding 150 kilotons; not to carry out any group explosion consisting of a number of individual explosions having an aggregate yield exceeding 1500 kilotons; and not to carry out any group explosion having an aggregate yield exceeding 150 kilotons unless the individual explosions in the group could be identified and measured by agreed verification procedures. The parties also reaffirmed their obligations to comply fully with the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963. The parties reserve the right to carry out nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes in the territory of another country if requested to do so but only in full compliance with the yield limitations and other provisions of the PNE Treaty and in accord with the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty of 1996 prohibits all nuclear explosions regardless of whether they are for peaceful purposes or not. Project Gasbuggy was an underground nuclear detonation carried out by the United States Atomic Energy Commission on December 10 1967 in rural northern New Mexico. It was part of Operation Plowshare a program designed to find peaceful uses for nuclear explosions. Gasbuggy was carried out by the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory and the El Paso Natural Gas Company with funding from the Atomic Energy Commission. Its purpose was to determine if nuclear explosions could be useful in fracturing rock formations for natural gas extraction. The site lying in the Carson National Forest is approximately 34 km 21 mi southwest of Dulce New Mexico and 87 km 54 mi east of Farmington and was chosen because natural gas deposits were known to be held in sandstone beneath Leandro Canyon. A 29 kt 120 TJ device was placed at a depth of 1288 m 4227 ft underground then the well was backfilled before the device was detonated; a crowd had gathered to watch the detonation from atop a nearby butte. The detonation took place after a couple of delays the last one caused by a breakdown of the explosive refrigeration system. The detonation produced a rubble chimney that was 24 m 80 ft wide and 102 m 335 ft high above the blast center. After an initial surface cleanup effort the site sat idle for over a decade. A later surface cleanup effort primarily tackled leftover toxic materials. In 1978 a marker monument was installed at the Surface Ground Zero SGZ point that provided basic explanation of the historic test. Below the main plaque lies another which indicates that no drilling or digging is allowed without government permission. The site is publicly accessible via the Carson National Forest F.S. 357 dirt road/Indian J10 that leads into the Carson National Forest. Following the Project Gasbuggy test two subsequent nuclear explosion fracturing experiments were conducted in western Colorado in an effort to refine the technique. They were Project Rulison in 1969 and Project Rio Blanco in 1973. In both cases the gas radioactivity was still seen as too high and in the last case the triple-blast rubble chimney structures disappointed the design engineers. Soon after that test the ~ 15-year Project Plowshare program funding dried up. These early fracturing tests were later superseded by hydraulic fracturing fracking technologies. Lawrence Radiation Laboratory unknown
1975ref. 40583Hinsdale IL: American Nuclear Society 1975. First Edition. First Printing. good. 836 wraps illus. index coves somewhat worn and soiled. Volume 22 of the Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. American Nuclear Society paperback
1972ref. 32545Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency 1972. good ex-lib. 27 cm library binding usual library markings some wear and soiling to boards. Nuclear Energy Agency hardcover
1979ref. 58526Washington DC: The Office: available from GPO Sales Program Division of Technical. 1979. Wraps. Fair. No dust jacket as issued. Cover shows damp signs. Some page rippling noted. All pages separate and text complete. 51 p. in various pagings; 28 cm. "NUREG-0632. " The Office: [available from GPO Sales Program, Division of Technical.. paperback