1774réf. N3344Dublin Printed by the Executors of David Hay: Printed for the executors of David Hay Assignee of the late Boulter Grierson printer to the King's most excellent Majesty 1774. Hardcover. Fine. 4to - over 9¾ - 12" tall. viii un-numbered160pp. Original full calf. originally published in 1757 by Mount and Page London. A FINE COPY IN THE ORIGINAL FULL CALF. Joints cracked but sound. Clean throughout with no damage.A TABLE OF DIFFERENCE OF LATITUDE AND DEPARTURES To Every Single Degree As Far As 300 DISTANCE; P1-132; A JOURNAL OF A VOYAGE FROM ENGLAND TO MADEIRA P133-160. PLEASE EMAIL FOR PHOTOS. A RARE DUBLIN ISSUE IN THE ORIGINAL BINDING. THE FIRST DUBLIN EDITION APPEARS TO BE 1766 4 copies only recorded in Jisc 20X15CMS Printed for the executors of David Hay, Assignee of the late Boulter Grierson printer to the King's most excellent Majesty hardcover
1798réf. 628625Philadelphia: Printed by Zachariah Poulson Junior 1798. Hardcover. Very Good. First editions. 12mo. Fourth convention 59 1. Fifth convention 20pp. Bound in quarter cloth with wrappers of the 1797 issue affixed to the boards. Old library marks: bookplate perforations small rubbed stamp state "Bound for Library 1914" else very good. These pamphlets record the proceedings of two of the earliest American efforts at national organization around the Anti-Slavery cause. Beginning in January 1794 the first meeting drew delegates from the abolition societies of Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware and Maryland. Later meetings added attendees from Rhode Island and Virginia and the two pamphlets lists the names of those present - among them Benjamin RushWilliam Rawle Caspar Wistar Joseph Bloomfield William Dunlap and others. The gatherings "voted to petition Congress to prohibit the slave trade and also to appeal to the legislatures of the various states to abolish slavery. The petitions pointed out the inconsistency of a country that had recently rejected the tyranny of kings engaging in "domestic despotism." Despite limited funds or authority and infrequent meetings these conventions harnessed considerable public support for reform and imbued their ideological successor the American Anti-Slavery Society with cornerstone goals designed to "bring the whole nation to a speedy repentance." Both pamphlets are very scarce in the trade. For both. Printed by Zachariah Poulson, Junior hardcover
1798réf. 628625Philadelphia: Printed by Zachariah Poulson Junior 1798. Hardcover. Very Good. First editions. 12mo. Fourth convention 59 1. Fifth convention 20pp. Bound in quarter cloth with wrappers of the 1797 issue affixed to the boards. Old library marks: bookplate perforations small rubbed stamp state "Bound for Library 1914" else very good. These pamphlets record the proceedings of two of the earliest American efforts at national organization around the Anti-Slavery cause. Beginning in January 1794 the first meeting drew delegates from the abolition societies of Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware and Maryland. Later meetings added attendees from Rhode Island and Virginia and the two pamphlets lists the names of those present - among them Benjamin RushWilliam Rawle Caspar Wistar Joseph Bloomfield William Dunlap and others. The gatherings "voted to petition Congress to prohibit the slave trade and also to appeal to the legislatures of the various states to abolish slavery. The petitions pointed out the inconsistency of a country that had recently rejected the tyranny of kings engaging in "domestic despotism." Despite limited funds or authority and infrequent meetings these conventions harnessed considerable public support for reform and imbued their ideological successor the American Anti-Slavery Society with cornerstone goals designed to "bring the whole nation to a speedy repentance." Both pamphlets are very scarce in the trade. For both. Printed by Zachariah Poulson, Junior hardcover books
1791réf. 43202Philadelphia: Mathew Carey; Carey Stewart and Co. No. 188 Market-street 1791. Original Sewn Binding without outer wrappers or boards 8vo pages 285-344 1-48 1-40 1-48 total 196 pages with different sections correctly paginated for this issue. With Moses Seixas’ famous letter to President George Washington Seixas wrote to President Washington on behalf of the Newport congregation whose home is the Touro Synagogue the oldest synagogue still standing in America. This letter which appears on p 40 of Appendix II and Washington's reply comprise one of the most famous statements on religious freedom of this period. Here published in America’s first literary magazine George Washington’s famous phrase describing a government that "gives to bigotry no sanction and to persecution no assistance" was originally coined by Seixas in this very letter. It is a moving Biblically toned greeting to the president and was repeated by Washington in his reply assuring it a place among the most cherished in the American historical vocabulary. George Washington's visit to Newport Rhode Island August 17-18 1790 ranks among the seminal episodes in the history of American Jewish religious liberty. Washington left Rhode Island off his travel itinerary the previous year in response to the state's failure to ratify the Constitution. By 1790 after becoming the last state to ratify Washington visited Newport along with members of his administration including Thomas Jefferson. Moses Seixas 1744-1809 a Newport merchant warden of Kaal Kadosh Yeshuat Israel Newport Hebrew Congregation and a prominent Mason was one of the civic leaders who met with Washington. Seixas had a long history as a revolutionary patriot: he remained in the city after it was occupied by the British during the war and signed a document during the occupation pledging loyalty to the patriotic cause. Additionally his brother Rabbi Gershon Mendes Seixas minister of New York's Shearith Israel Congregation known as the "patriot rabbi" was one of fourteen clerygymen officiating at Washington's 1789 Presidential inauguration. Finally as a fellow Mason he and Washington would have had a natural connection. Seixas' eloquent message reads in part: "Deprived as we heretofore have been of the invaluable rights of free Citizens we now with a deep sense of gratitude to the Almighty Disposer of all events behold a Government erected by the MAJESTY OF THE PEOPLE – a Government which to bigotry gives no sanction to persecution no assistance – but generously affording to ALL Liberty of conscience and immunities of Citizenship: – deeming every one of whatever Nation tongue or language equal parts of the great governmental Machine: – This so ample and extensive Federal Union whose basis is Philanthropy Mutual confidence and Public Virtue we cannot but acknowledge to be the work of the Great God who ruleth in the Armies of Heaven and among the Inhabitants of the Earth doing whatever seemeth him good." Grounding religious freedom in natural rights and echoing Seixas' words Washington later replied with an echo of Seixas' language regarding religious freedom: "The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States which gives to bigotry no sanction to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all occasions their effectual support." See JE Vol. IX pp. 294-295; EJ. Vol. XIV p. 1117; J.L. Blau and S.W. Baron The Jews of the United States 1790-1840 A Documentary History Vol. 1 1963 pp. 8-10. Other pieces of interest include notes on the slave trade by Benjamin Franklin and notes on the Revolutionary War. “The American Museum or Repository of Ancient and Modern Fugutive Pieces &c. Prose and Poetical “title changed to “The American Museum or Universal Magazine” in January 1790 was America's first literary magazine featuring early printings of the US Constitution the Bill of Rights various State constitutions Alexander Hamilton's Report on Manufactures and parts of the Federalist Papers. Complete issue in original sewn binding. Overall condition is very good with scattered darkening and foxing though paper and binding remain nice and strong with clean crisp edges including the notable page containing the address to Washington A Cornerstone of American Judaica. BAMR-69-7A. Philadelphia: Mathew Carey; Carey, Stewart, and Co. No. 188 Market-street unknown
1928réf. 347h5608London: Arrowsmith. Good. 1928. First Edition. Hardcover. "Whatever place its author may ultimately occupy in future histories of England one thing is certain that in the history of the Jewish people the name of Balfour will enjoy unchallenged immortality evoking comparison with that of Cyrus for the issue of the Balfour Declaration marked the opening of a new epoch in the annals of Jewry which will be recognised as such even in the remotest centuries to come. In this little book have been gathered together all the utterances of Lord Balfour on the interpretation and implications of his Declaration on its political aspects and its practical realisation made during the last ten years." - Preface. 4 5-128 pp. 7" x 4.75". Original spine label present and intact. Front free endpaper professionaly replaced. Tanning to central portion of half-title. Prior owner's ink stamp upon title page. Duplicate spine label bound at p.128. Average external wear. Binding intact with moderate forward lean. Quarter inch notch from top of backstrip. Includes replica dust jacket preserved in glossy new archival-grade Brodart. A sound example of this jewel of Zionist history. Emanuel p.48. ASIN B000852UV4; 12mo - over 6¾" - 7¾" tall; Zionism - History Balfour Declaration Lord Balfour Arthur James Balfour Israel - History Lord Rothschild Palestine Mandate The Hebrew University . Arrowsmith hardcover
réf. 54789Unbound. A gift certificate redeemable for up to five thousand U.S. dollars $5000 worth of merchandise from Between the Covers Rare Books Inc. Individually numbered and bearing a portrait of the Bard by artist Tom Bloom. unknown
réf. 54789Unbound. A gift certificate redeemable for up to five thousand U.S. dollars $5000 worth of merchandise from Between the Covers Rare Books Inc. Individually numbered and bearing a portrait of the Bard by artist Tom Bloom. unknown books
1768réf. 1206031768. First Edition. CATHERINE THE GREAT. The Grand Instructions to the Commissioners Appointed to Frame a New Code of Laws for the Russian Empire: Composed by Her Imperial Majesty Catherine II. Empress of All the Russias. To which is prefixed A Description of the Manner of opening the Commission with the Order and Rules for Electing the Commissioners. London: T. Jefferys 1768. Quarto contemporary marbled boards rebacked in period-style calf-gilt red morocco spine label raised bands; pp. i-v vi-xxiii 1 3-258. $5000.First edition in English of the celebrated Nakaz of Catherine the Great drawing extensively on Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws heralded by Voltaire and Diderot initially issued in Russia in 1767 Ñ""the single piece of Russian legislative material best known abroad""Ñaligned with the later American constitution for its ""shared characteristics and techniques"" highly elusive in contemporary boards.""Born into a family of obscure German aristocrats delivered to St. Petersburg at the age of 14 and married in great pomp to the feckless heir to the Russian throne Catherine found herself"" in a loveless marriage and without political support Smithsonian. In 1765 after Peter's death and several years into her reign Catherine began crafting the Nakaz working on its almost daily for nearly two years. ""Fundamentally the Nakaz which Voltaire is said to have called the finest monument of the century is a legal and a political document. It represents Catherine's ambition early in her reign to remodel Russia's laws in accordance with new principles expounded in Western Europe. The Nakaz consists of three parts containing 655 articles in all. The major part 526 articles was made public in Moscow on July 30 1767. It treats the historical development of Russia and monarchial absolutism; the nature and forms of laws; crime and punishment; social structure and religious freedom. On February 28 and April 8 1768 two supplements of 40 and 89 articles respectively dealing with police expenditures revenues and taxation were added to the Nakaz"" Dmytryshyn Economic Content 1-2. ""While she worked alongside a secretary it was Catherine herself who selected and organized the material and wrote out the finished version."" In creating the Nakaz she chose her texts carefully. Nearly 300 ""owe something to Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws 1748"" with about 100 clauses traced to Beccaria's On Crimes and Punishments 1764 and many from Voltaire's Encyclopdie."" While the Nakaz is ""not a written constitution it nonetheless shared characteristics and techniques with later texts that were constitutions"" Colley Gun Ship and Pen 61-73 emphasis in original.Catherine was ""not out to create a constitutional monarchy"" yet her Nakaz ""was innovative and influentialÉ the Legislative Commission that met in Moscow in August 1767 to discuss the Nakaz differed from later seminal constitution-making assemblies butÉ it also anticipated and even exceeded them. Like the convention that met in Philadelphia in 1787"" this Russian Commission assembled delegates from across the empire. Further these ""Moscow deputies were also markedly more diverse in terms of social economic religious and ethnic background than the men of PhiladelphiaÉ women too received some recognition in this Moscow commission something that did not happen in revolutionary AmericaÉ Moreover in sharp contrast with the men of Philadelphia in 1787 not all of the Moscow deputies were white and not all of them where Christian"" Colley 73-77. ""It was doubtless because of its 'radical' content that its publication was banned in FranceÉ The significance of the Nakaz centers not only in its West European content"" but also on distinctive aspects of Russian culture that ""make the NakazÉ an outstanding document in Russian political economic and historical literature"" Dmytryshyn 9. The Nakaz was never enacted yet it is ""the single piece of Russian legislative material best known abroad. It secured for Catherine the encomium 'the Great'"" Yale Law School. First edition in English. Catherine's manuscript was written in French from which she produced a Russian translation First editions were published in Moscow on August 10 1767 in Russian and German: a first German edition appeared in 1769. Little is known of translator Mikhail Tatischeff other than that he was attached to the Russian Embassy in London. Engraved ornamental initials and headpieces. Mispaginated as issued without loss of text. ESTC N6651. With trace of bookplate removal; later blank free endpapers. Bookseller ticket.Text fresh and fine light edge-wear rubbing to contemporary marbled boards. A handsome wide-margined near-fine copy. hardcover
1768réf. 1206031768. First Edition. CATHERINE THE GREAT. The Grand Instructions to the Commissioners Appointed to Frame a New Code of Laws for the Russian Empire: Composed by Her Imperial Majesty Catherine II. Empress of All the Russias. To which is prefixed A Description of the Manner of opening the Commission with the Order and Rules for Electing the Commissioners. London: T. Jefferys 1768. Quarto contemporary marbled boards rebacked in period-style calf-gilt red morocco spine label raised bands; pp. i-v vi-xxiii 1 3-258. $5000.First edition in English of the celebrated Nakaz of Catherine the Great drawing extensively on Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws heralded by Voltaire and Diderot initially issued in Russia in 1767 Ñ""the single piece of Russian legislative material best known abroad""Ñaligned with the later American constitution for its ""shared characteristics and techniques"" highly elusive in contemporary boards.""Born into a family of obscure German aristocrats delivered to St. Petersburg at the age of 14 and married in great pomp to the feckless heir to the Russian throne Catherine found herself"" in a loveless marriage and without political support Smithsonian. In 1765 after Peter's death and several years into her reign Catherine began crafting the Nakaz working on its almost daily for nearly two years. ""Fundamentally the Nakaz which Voltaire is said to have called the finest monument of the century is a legal and a political document. It represents Catherine's ambition early in her reign to remodel Russia's laws in accordance with new principles expounded in Western Europe. The Nakaz consists of three parts containing 655 articles in all. The major part 526 articles was made public in Moscow on July 30 1767. It treats the historical development of Russia and monarchial absolutism; the nature and forms of laws; crime and punishment; social structure and religious freedom. On February 28 and April 8 1768 two supplements of 40 and 89 articles respectively dealing with police expenditures revenues and taxation were added to the Nakaz"" Dmytryshyn Economic Content 1-2. ""While she worked alongside a secretary it was Catherine herself who selected and organized the material and wrote out the finished version."" In creating the Nakaz she chose her texts carefully. Nearly 300 ""owe something to Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws 1748"" with about 100 clauses traced to Beccaria's On Crimes and Punishments 1764 and many from Voltaire's Encyclopdie."" While the Nakaz is ""not a written constitution it nonetheless shared characteristics and techniques with later texts that were constitutions"" Colley Gun Ship and Pen 61-73 emphasis in original.Catherine was ""not out to create a constitutional monarchy"" yet her Nakaz ""was innovative and influentialÉ the Legislative Commission that met in Moscow in August 1767 to discuss the Nakaz differed from later seminal constitution-making assemblies butÉ it also anticipated and even exceeded them. Like the convention that met in Philadelphia in 1787"" this Russian Commission assembled delegates from across the empire. Further these ""Moscow deputies were also markedly more diverse in terms of social economic religious and ethnic background than the men of PhiladelphiaÉ women too received some recognition in this Moscow commission something that did not happen in revolutionary AmericaÉ Moreover in sharp contrast with the men of Philadelphia in 1787 not all of the Moscow deputies were white and not all of them where Christian"" Colley 73-77. ""It was doubtless because of its 'radical' content that its publication was banned in FranceÉ The significance of the Nakaz centers not only in its West European content"" but also on distinctive aspects of Russian culture that ""make the NakazÉ an outstanding document in Russian political economic and historical literature"" Dmytryshyn 9. The Nakaz was never enacted yet it is ""the single piece of Russian legislative material best known abroad. It secured for Catherine the encomium 'the Great'"" Yale Law School. First edition in English. Catherine's manuscript was written in French from which she produced a Russian translation First editions were published in Moscow on August 10 1767 in Russian and German: a first German edition appeared in 1769. Little is known of translator Mikhail Tatischeff other than that he was attached to the Russian Embassy in London. Engraved ornamental initials and headpieces. Mispaginated as issued without loss of text. ESTC N6651. With trace of bookplate removal; later blank free endpapers. Bookseller ticket.Text fresh and fine light edge-wear rubbing to contemporary marbled boards. A handsome wide-margined near-fine copy. hardcover books
réf. 20831EBeverly Hills CA: National Pictures Corp n.d. Original 109 page shooting script with color rewrite pages for the classic 1953 science fiction film Invaders from Mars written by Richard Blake directed by William Cameron Menzies starring Helena Carter Arthur Franz Jimmy Hunt and Leif Erickson. Bradbound in printed studio covers. Very good lightly used copy with some minor spotting to the front cover and minor edge wear. Enclosed in a handsome custom red morocco and cloth clamshell box. Due in large part to Menzies’ innovative techniques Invaders from Mars was the first feature science fiction film to show aliens and their spacecraft in color and was rushed into production to premiere before the much-anticipated George Pal film of H.G. Wells’ novel War of the Worlds. William Cameron Menzies 1896 - 1957 worked to great acclaim primarily as a production and set designer notably for The Thief of Bagdad 1924 The Adventures of Tom Sawyer 1938 David O. Selznik’s Gone With the Wind 1939 and Alfred Hitchcock’s Spellbound 1945. Mr. Menzies won two Oscars at the very first Academy Awards in 1929 for Best Art Direction for The Dove and Tempest and in 1940 at the 12th Academy Awards won an Academy Honorary Award for “outstanding achievement in the use of color for the enhancement of dramatic mood” for Gone With the Wind. Some of his other films include The Iron Mask 1929 Our Town 1940 The Pride of the Yankees 1942 For Whom the Bell Tolls 1943 and Duel in the Sun 1946. National Pictures Corp hardcover
réf. 1451Francfurt: Apud Haeredes Christiani Egenolphi 1563. Hardcover. Good. Quarto. viff. 42 43 iii 57 v pages. With separate title-pages to parts II and III. Poorly bound margins trimmed. In some instances catchwords and signature marks have been cut off not affecting text. Sheep somewhat worn. Kleinheyer/Schröder Deutsche Juristen aus 5. Jhdtn. 1983 147-149. Bound with: Kling M. Matrimonialium . Melchior Kling 1504-1571 from Hanau was an important 16th century German jurist and proponent of the systematic school of jurisprudence. 0 Francfurt: Apud Haeredes Christiani Egenolphi, 1563. hardcover
réf. 1450Francfurt: Apud Haeredes Christiani Egenolphi 1559. Hardcover. Good. Quarto. iv 44ff. Sheep somewhat worn. Kleinheyer/Schröder Deutsche Juristen aus 5. Jhdtn. 1983 147-149. Bound with: Kling M. In Feudorum usus Consuetudines . Melchior Kling 1504-1571 from Hanau was an important 16th century German jurist and proponent of the systematic school of jurisprudence. 0 Francfurt: Apud Haeredes Christiani Egenolphi, 1559. hardcover
1896réf. 056105Mecca: Hicâz Vilâyet Matbaasi Mecca AH 1314 CE 1896/97. 1896. 1st Edition . Hardcover. Very Good. 8vo - over 7¾ - 9¾" tall. Contemporary quarter purple cloth. 4to. 28 x 20 cm. In Ottoman Turkish and Arabic with sporadic Persian verses. 1 blank page 3 222 p. A label on spine slight wear to spine single leaf of index is loosely inserted. Else a very good and collectible copy "Al-Matba'a al-Miriyya" seal on colophon as a common practice of preventing counterfeits in the period. An exceptionally rare first Mecca edition of a single-volume work containing two celebrated texts representing the final nineteenth-century Turkish commentaries on the Qasîda-i Burda. Authored by Necib Bey of Antioch an Ottoman official who served in the Hijaz the volume was printed at the first press established in the region by Osman Nuri Pasha. The Qasîda-i Burda is a thirteenth-century ode of praise to Muhammad composed by the Egyptian Shadhili mystic al-Bûsîrî. The first two pages of the work are devoted to complimentary letters written for the book by the then Governor of the Hijaz Ahmed Ratib Pasha 1846-1913 and by the Arab scholars Abd al-Jalil Burade and Arif Khan Tashkendi. One of the letters is in Arabic the other in Ottoman Turkish. The final Turkish commentary on the Qasîda-i Burda produced in the nineteenth century belongs to Necib Bey of Antioch d. after 1319/1902 who served as an official in the Hijaz region. Necib Bey held administrative posts at both institutions known as al-Tekiyyât al-Miriyya The Egyptian Tekke charitable imarets established by Mehmed Ali Pasha of Kavala the Khedive of Egypt d. 1265/1849 one in Mecca and the other in Medina. As he himself states in his commentary Necib Bey received his education in Western Anatolia and travelled extensively across a wide geographical area including regions beyond Ottoman territory such as Europe and Russia marking him as a Turkish traveller and scholar of broad experience. In addition to these qualities he was also active as an educator and is known to have tutored members of the elite including Khedive Abbas Hilmi II of Egypt d. 1944 and his brother Mehmed Ali Pasha. Two works by Necib Bey are known both of which are Turkish commentaries on the Qasida-i Burda poems of Ka'b b. Zuhayr and al-Bûsîrî. The first bears the title Is'âd: Shar-i Bânet Su'âd and the second Mukhtaar Tawassul: Shar-i Qasîda-i Burda. These two works were published together in a single bound volume in 1896/97 at the Hijaz Provincial Printing House. The title Mukhtaar Tawassul derives from the fact that this work is an abridgement of the commentary entitled Tawassul by Mekkî Mehmed Efendi d. 1212/1797. The commentary entitled Is'âd takes its name from the Arabic commentary Is'âd 'alâ Bânet Su'âd written by the Egyptian scholar Ibrâhîm b. Muammad al-Bâjûrî d. 1277/1860. The commentator explains this choice of title with the statement: "This commentary being in the nature of a translation of Bâjûrî's commentary has therefore been named Is'âd after its original title." However the diversity of sources evident in the work the inclusion of autobiographical details Sufi narratives poetic examples in three languages and several critical remarks directed at the primary source clearly demonstrate that the text stands much closer to an original composition ta'lîf than to a mere translation tarjama. Gürler. ON THE FIRST PRINTING HOUSE IN THE HIJAZ: The distinctive cultural character of Meccan society as a centre for learning intellectual exchange and scholarly debate was a decisive factor in the introduction of printing to Mecca. This development was welcomed by both scholars and the local population and materialized in 1882 under the auspices of the Ottoman governor of the Hijaz Osman Nuri Pasha. Although the Ottoman government had established the first printing press in the Arabian Peninsula earlier in Sana'a in 1877 1295 AH Mecca became acquainted with printing shortly thereafter in 1300 AH 1882-83 with the founding of an official government press. The Meccan pres Hicâz Vilâyet Matbaasi, Mecca, AH 1314 [CE 1896/97]. hardcover
réf. 614444to. 7 pages approximately 1200 words in a completely legible hand on lined stationery with the embossed stamp of Evans and Cogswell Charleston. Docketed on the verso of the final leaf "July 15 1861 / James Simons / to / Governor Pickens / Reply to Letter / of Gov. P / 11 July 1861." Brigadier General James Simons's draft copy of a letter further explaining his reasons for resigning his command given in reply to a July 11 letter from Gov. Pickens that apparently had quarreled with earlier correspondence from Simons responding point by point to criticisms he feels the Governor has leveled against him over differences of opinion regarding the military defensibility of Charleston Harbor. Most if not all of the Pickens-Simons correspondence concerning this matter has been published; the James Simons papers at the University of South Carolina holds correspondence from Pickens but we have not been able to locate the original manuscripts or other drafts for the Simons portion of this correspondence. Old tideline from dampstaining with professional conservation work cleaning the paper restoring chipped areas along the lower edge through leaf-casting and completing several letters and marks with matching manuscript on four leaves. Folded for mailing or filing. 61444 9835. Following the Union Army take over of Fort Sumter by Major Robert Anderson on December 26 1860 just six days after South Carolina seceded from the Union Gov. Pickens directed Major General Schinierle to occupy Fort Moultrie Fort Johnson and Castle Pinckney and to establish a battery on Morris Island to prevent at all costs the reinforcement of Anderson's men. Simons as commander of the 4th Brigade of the Charleston Militia was second in command of the defenses for the harbor occupying the critical spot at Morris Island at the harbor's entrance. He expressed his concerns over the defense of the harbor in a six-page report to the Governor on January 1 1861: "I cannot sacrifice to matter of Etiquette questions and issues of such momentous importance as now surround us . The line of operations embraces four points 1 Fort Moultrie 2 Castle Pinckney 3 Fort Johnson 4 Morris Island. By the map which accompanies this paper it will appear that your lines of communication with these points . are directly within the range and effective power of Fort Sumter - the Citadel of the Harbour controlling every point. At the first return of fire from Fort Sumter your lines of communication are utterly cut off." He goes on to report: "Fort Moultrie - This position is wholly untenable - Lt. Col. De Saussure . gave you prompt notice of this fact on the morning after his occupation." To this Gov. Pickens responded with great offense insinuating that Simons was counseling abandonment of the harbor defenses. Simons' first letter of resignation came almost immediately on January 8 but he was prevailed upon by the Secretary of War to withdraw it. The 4th Brigade under Simons command led the first attack on Fort Sumter on April 12 1861. The controversy between Simons and the Governor continued to simmer until a few months after Anderson and his Union forces had surrendered Fort Sumter. By July in spite of Simons' successes defending the Charleston harbor he again offered his resignation. Gov. Pickens apparently wrote to refute Simons arguments. Simon replies in this lengthy manuscript letter: "I had hoped I would not have been obliged to extend this correspondence but I am sure your sense of justice will indulge me a letter further. I have assigned among other reasons for resigning that you have not shown that recognition which appeared to be due to me as a general officer. I detailed several instances but confined myself to the facts neither canvassing nor questioning your intuition or motive. You reply that you do not think my reasons for resigning are sufficient yet you adopt a line of argument to arrive at this conclusion which not only admits the facts I have stated but is founded . on a settled intention not to consult me and why Because on two occasions having been called into council & my opinion specially asked I ventured to differ from you & express opinions not in conformity with yours. In other words my rank position & counsel as a public officer were to be overlooked because I did not yield acquiescence to that which did not accord with my honest convictions . I must ask your indulgence a little longer. You say that about the 29 December I made "a regular Military Protest" against everything you had done or prepared to do & demanded a council of War. That on the 3 day of January last you endorsed on the back of my demand for a council of War that you could agree to no council of War that would drive you to any such conclusions. Permit me in justice to myself to show you the mistaken impressions under which you seem to labour. The date of my Report was 1 Jany & not 29 December. This date is important as you will see. I respectfully ask leave to correct your misapprehension also as to its being a 'regular Military Protest.' It appears to me that you are mistaken. The paper I sent to you was a Report on the defense of the Harbour of Charleston. I sent it to you because on 31 Dec. 1860 you directed Major Genl. Schinierle in you own words as follows -'You are now ordered to see and attend particularly to the objects & the commands I have detailed to you above & further purpose you are directed to call into requisition and council the valuable aid and co-operation of Brigadier General Simons.' Thus called and in pursuance of my responsibility and duty as Brigadier General I made a Report of my examination of the Harbour & my opinion thereon. That it was a Report & not a Protest I cite your excellency as both witness & judge. On the 2 Jany. You say in a letter to me 'Your Extraordinary report I received last night & have only to say that I do not pretend that the orders & disposition of the forces in Charleston Harbour are at all perfect or beyond the criticism of strict military rule.' If you thought it then 'a regular Military Protest' it seems to me that you would not have called it a report." Simons goes on to protest Gov. Pickens' actions in removing Capt. Gifford's Company from his command in late June "without giving me the least notice." He also asks for a copy of his original report which was reviewed and approved of by members of the Governor's Board of Ordnance at the time "as this document forms part of the public record of this transaction and may be of use to me in after history ." In conclusion Simons states that he regrets the "controversial character" of their correspondence and he does "disclaim any aggressive intention or spirit against yourself or your administration of public affairs. I hope I am too loyal a citizen to set so evil an example. I have been obliged to present my as it appears to me right in the record and to disclose the grounds on which I felt myself constrained to retire from my post at such a season but this does not abate my consideration for your high official station or my ardent hope for the successful termination of the Great Revolution in which we are engaged." Gov. Pickens did accept Simons' resignation. Simons went on to volunteer as a private in an artillery unit having given up his rank though he did not long serve in that capacity resuming his legal career. This letter with all of the corrections additions and deletions given here along with other letters in the Simons-Pickens correspondence was published as Address to the Officers of the Fourth Brigade Giving Them the Grounds for His Resignation; Respectfully Submitted to Them by James Simons July 1861 Charleston: Evans & Cogswell 1861; Parrish & Willingham 5048: Huntington Georgia Duke North Carolina Library Co. of Philadelphia South Carolina Historical Society. Manuscript material from Brig. Gen. James Simons is scarce with the last recent records of sales at auction being for his manuscript report of the defenses of Charleston Harbor 1 Jan. 1861 having sold at Sotheby's in 2004 $9600 and the same item at Bloomsbury NY in 2008 7500 pounds. unknown
réf. 614444to. 7 pages approximately 1200 words in a completely legible hand on lined stationery with the embossed stamp of Evans and Cogswell Charleston. Docketed on the verso of the final leaf "July 15 1861 / James Simons / to / Governor Pickens / Reply to Letter / of Gov. P / 11 July 1861." Brigadier General James Simons's draft copy of a letter further explaining his reasons for resigning his command given in reply to a July 11 letter from Gov. Pickens that apparently had quarreled with earlier correspondence from Simons responding point by point to criticisms he feels the Governor has leveled against him over differences of opinion regarding the military defensibility of Charleston Harbor. Most if not all of the Pickens-Simons correspondence concerning this matter has been published; the James Simons papers at the University of South Carolina holds correspondence from Pickens but we have not been able to locate the original manuscripts or other drafts for the Simons portion of this correspondence. Old tideline from dampstaining with professional conservation work cleaning the paper restoring chipped areas along the lower edge through leaf-casting and completing several letters and marks with matching manuscript on four leaves. Folded for mailing or filing. 61444 9835. Following the Union Army take over of Fort Sumter by Major Robert Anderson on December 26 1860 just six days after South Carolina seceded from the Union Gov. Pickens directed Major General Schinierle to occupy Fort Moultrie Fort Johnson and Castle Pinckney and to establish a battery on Morris Island to prevent at all costs the reinforcement of Anderson's men. Simons as commander of the 4th Brigade of the Charleston Militia was second in command of the defenses for the harbor occupying the critical spot at Morris Island at the harbor's entrance. He expressed his concerns over the defense of the harbor in a six-page report to the Governor on January 1 1861: "I cannot sacrifice to matter of Etiquette questions and issues of such momentous importance as now surround us . The line of operations embraces four points 1 Fort Moultrie 2 Castle Pinckney 3 Fort Johnson 4 Morris Island. By the map which accompanies this paper it will appear that your lines of communication with these points . are directly within the range and effective power of Fort Sumter - the Citadel of the Harbour controlling every point. At the first return of fire from Fort Sumter your lines of communication are utterly cut off." He goes on to report: "Fort Moultrie - This position is wholly untenable - Lt. Col. De Saussure . gave you prompt notice of this fact on the morning after his occupation." To this Gov. Pickens responded with great offense insinuating that Simons was counseling abandonment of the harbor defenses. Simons' first letter of resignation came almost immediately on January 8 but he was prevailed upon by the Secretary of War to withdraw it. The 4th Brigade under Simons command led the first attack on Fort Sumter on April 12 1861. The controversy between Simons and the Governor continued to simmer until a few months after Anderson and his Union forces had surrendered Fort Sumter. By July in spite of Simons' successes defending the Charleston harbor he again offered his resignation. Gov. Pickens apparently wrote to refute Simons arguments. Simon replies in this lengthy manuscript letter: "I had hoped I would not have been obliged to extend this correspondence but I am sure your sense of justice will indulge me a letter further. I have assigned among other reasons for resigning that you have not shown that recognition which appeared to be due to me as a general officer. I detailed several instances but confined myself to the facts neither canvassing nor questioning your intuition or motive. You reply that you do not think my reasons for resigning are sufficient yet you adopt a line of argument to arrive at this conclusion which not only admits the facts I have stated but is founded . on a settled intention not to consult me and why Because on two occasions having been called into council & my opinion specially asked I ventured to differ from you & express opinions not in conformity with yours. In other words my rank position & counsel as a public officer were to be overlooked because I did not yield acquiescence to that which did not accord with my honest convictions . I must ask your indulgence a little longer. You say that about the 29 December I made "a regular Military Protest" against everything you had done or prepared to do & demanded a council of War. That on the 3 day of January last you endorsed on the back of my demand for a council of War that you could agree to no council of War that would drive you to any such conclusions. Permit me in justice to myself to show you the mistaken impressions under which you seem to labour. The date of my Report was 1 Jany & not 29 December. This date is important as you will see. I respectfully ask leave to correct your misapprehension also as to its being a 'regular Military Protest.' It appears to me that you are mistaken. The paper I sent to you was a Report on the defense of the Harbour of Charleston. I sent it to you because on 31 Dec. 1860 you directed Major Genl. Schinierle in you own words as follows -'You are now ordered to see and attend particularly to the objects & the commands I have detailed to you above & further purpose you are directed to call into requisition and council the valuable aid and co-operation of Brigadier General Simons.' Thus called and in pursuance of my responsibility and duty as Brigadier General I made a Report of my examination of the Harbour & my opinion thereon. That it was a Report & not a Protest I cite your excellency as both witness & judge. On the 2 Jany. You say in a letter to me 'Your Extraordinary report I received last night & have only to say that I do not pretend that the orders & disposition of the forces in Charleston Harbour are at all perfect or beyond the criticism of strict military rule.' If you thought it then 'a regular Military Protest' it seems to me that you would not have called it a report." Simons goes on to protest Gov. Pickens' actions in removing Capt. Gifford's Company from his command in late June "without giving me the least notice." He also asks for a copy of his original report which was reviewed and approved of by members of the Governor's Board of Ordnance at the time "as this document forms part of the public record of this transaction and may be of use to me in after history ." In conclusion Simons states that he regrets the "controversial character" of their correspondence and he does "disclaim any aggressive intention or spirit against yourself or your administration of public affairs. I hope I am too loyal a citizen to set so evil an example. I have been obliged to present my as it appears to me right in the record and to disclose the grounds on which I felt myself constrained to retire from my post at such a season but this does not abate my consideration for your high official station or my ardent hope for the successful termination of the Great Revolution in which we are engaged." Gov. Pickens did accept Simons' resignation. Simons went on to volunteer as a private in an artillery unit having given up his rank though he did not long serve in that capacity resuming his legal career. This letter with all of the corrections additions and deletions given here along with other letters in the Simons-Pickens correspondence was published as Address to the Officers of the Fourth Brigade Giving Them the Grounds for His Resignation; Respectfully Submitted to Them by James Simons July 1861 Charleston: Evans & Cogswell 1861; Parrish & Willingham 5048: Huntington Georgia Duke North Carolina Library Co. of Philadelphia South Carolina Historical Society. Manuscript material from Brig. Gen. James Simons is scarce with the last recent records of sales at auction being for his manuscript report of the defenses of Charleston Harbor 1 Jan. 1861 having sold at Sotheby's in 2004 $9600 and the same item at Bloomsbury NY in 2008 7500 pounds. unknown books
1869réf. 75295Washington D.C.:: The American Bond and Currency Detectory Company 1869. First edition. publisher's pebbled green gilt-lettered cloth. Small stray pen mark on the title page; neat tissue reinforcements to the inner hinges front and rear and evidence of a removal on the rear pastedown. The cloth is rubbed at the corners and extremities of the spine; tight and sound. A beautiful copy. Oblong small folio. Complete with twenty-two engraved plates many with multiple figures of registered bonds; and nine embossed chromolithograph plates of coins and coinage printed in gold silver and copper on dark maroon paper by J. Haehnlen Philadelphia. Issued under the Sanction of the United States Treasury Department and Containing Superb Illustrations in Genuine Tints Printed at the Treasury Department from the Original Dies in the Possession of the Government. The American Bond and Currency Detectory Company, hardcover
réf. 003106Colorado Springs Colorado: Pasco Land Company. 1st Edition . WALL_CHART. Good. W.L. Rockwell. An original undated 28 X 33 inch colored map showing the surveyed subdivision of Pasco Washington divided into land parcels suitable for purchase. Printed on thin paper stock this map shows Pasco within its geographical and railroad transportation context on the Columbia River. Advertising the availability and benefits of investing in plats within the yet to be fully developed city limits of Pasco this map offers primary source insight into early ownership of key properties around this Northern Pacific railroad hub located just north of the confluence of the Columbia & Snake River.There are interesting penciled notations relating to possible real estate sales activity. With a few holes at the folds some aging spots and edge wear this scarce map is generally in good shape. Pasco Land Company unknown
réf. 7712Several dozen manuscripts in various formats incl. long folded sheets stitched pamphlets sewn volumes and letters. Japan: ca. 1853-63. A substantial group of documents revealing internal high-level debates and discussions in response to Commodore Perry’s landings and later controversies that arose as Western powers established a foothold in Japan. This is an exceptional collection filled with top-secret information on government intrigues as the Japanese state responded to aggressive foreign expansion and dissenting groups within the government urging top-to-bottom reforms. The manuscripts touch upon pivotal events in Japan’s history: –Commodore Perry’s two expeditions July 1853 & February-March 1854 and the resulting ratification of the Treaty of Shimoda. –Japanese translations of the treaties signed with the United States Russia France and the United Kingdom from 1854 to 1858. –The assassination of Ii Naosuke in March 1860 also known as the Sakuradamon Incident which precipitated a violent backlash against foreigners under the banner of Sonno joi “Honor the Emperor expel the barbarians”. –General dissatisfaction with the bakufu and efforts to reform it. –The attempted assassination of Ando Nobumasa a chief councillor during this period. –The Namamugi Incident in September 1862 when the British merchant Charles L. Richardson was killed by Satsuma domain warriors. –The bombardment of Kagoshima August 1863. Among all these materials we must highlight several examples of manuscript kengen proposals and commentaries written by aristocrats with policy advice on the difficult situations faced by the Japanese state. These offer compelling perspectives on the most pressing dilemmas of the day. While they were not composed by the decision-makers these documents are filled with the minutiae and data employed in the policy-making process. All of the items are in a fine state of preservation. â§ John McMaster “Alcock and Harris. Foreign Diplomacy in Bakumatsu Japan” Monumenta Nipponica Vol. 22 No. 3/4 1967 pp. 305-367. unknown
réf. 7712Several dozen manuscripts in various formats incl. long folded sheets stitched pamphlets sewn volumes and letters. Japan: ca. 1853-63. A substantial group of documents revealing internal high-level debates and discussions in response to Commodore Perry’s landings and later controversies that arose as Western powers established a foothold in Japan. This is an exceptional collection filled with top-secret information on government intrigues as the Japanese state responded to aggressive foreign expansion and dissenting groups within the government urging top-to-bottom reforms. The manuscripts touch upon pivotal events in Japan’s history: –Commodore Perry’s two expeditions July 1853 & February-March 1854 and the resulting ratification of the Treaty of Shimoda. –Japanese translations of the treaties signed with the United States Russia France and the United Kingdom from 1854 to 1858. –The assassination of Ii Naosuke in March 1860 also known as the Sakuradamon Incident which precipitated a violent backlash against foreigners under the banner of Sonno joi “Honor the Emperor expel the barbarians”. –General dissatisfaction with the bakufu and efforts to reform it. –The attempted assassination of Ando Nobumasa a chief councillor during this period. –The Namamugi Incident in September 1862 when the British merchant Charles L. Richardson was killed by Satsuma domain warriors. –The bombardment of Kagoshima August 1863. Among all these materials we must highlight several examples of manuscript kengen proposals and commentaries written by aristocrats with policy advice on the difficult situations faced by the Japanese state. These offer compelling perspectives on the most pressing dilemmas of the day. While they were not composed by the decision-makers these documents are filled with the minutiae and data employed in the policy-making process. All of the items are in a fine state of preservation. â§ John McMaster “Alcock and Harris. Foreign Diplomacy in Bakumatsu Japan” Monumenta Nipponica Vol. 22 No. 3/4 1967 pp. 305-367. unknown books
réf. 5521722. Very good. Chiaroscuro woodcut on cream laid paper laid down to a cream laid paper matrix as issued printed from three blocks in dusky pink olive green and grayish blue with a gold border and pink watercolor frame. Printed area measures 6 11/16 x 4 5/8 inches 170 × 117 mm watercolor frame measures 8 1/2 x 6 3/8 inches 215 x 160 mm and the matrix measures 15 1/2 x 11 inches 393 x 278 mm full margins. Inscribed "P. Inv. AMZ del et Sculp" in the block lower left and dated "1722" in the block lower right. An excellent example with rich color in very good condition and with no visible defects. Bartsch 22. Count Antonio Maria Zanetti the Elder visited London from his native Venice in 1721. During the course of that trip Zanetti purchased 130 drawings by Parmigianino from the collection of Thomas Howard the late Earl of Arundel and also had the opportunity to view some early chiaroscuro woodcuts which belonged to William Cavendish then the second Duke of Devonshire. Zanetti was completely taken by the painterly nature of the chiaroscuro prints and upon his return to Italy he set out to teach himself the technique of printing from multiple wooden blocks. Zanetti experimented widely with the appearance of color and the influence it had on his printed images and he explored the emotional and visual evocations which different pigment combinations generated. Zanetti reimagined Parmigianino's masterful Mannerist compositions using this method and the results were so well received that they initiated an 18th century revival of the romantic art form. This particular print is among those works after Parmigianino which launched this resurgence in chiaroscuro printmaking. unknown
2000réf. G0711932093I4N00Music Sales Ltd 2000. Paperback. Very Good. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More Spend Less.Dust jacket quality is not guaranteed. Music Sales Ltd paperback
réf. GK9-HA1The University of Chicago Press and Johnson Reprint Company. NEAR-COMPLETE journal run from 1901 through 1995 missing volumes 1thru 8 1893-1900; and 17 1909; volumes 9 thru 16 and 18 thru 27 are softcover reprints by Johnson Reprint Company; volumes 28 through 104 are original editions ex-corporate library in Hardcover buckram cloth; all volumes are in good to very good condition. THIS MULTI-VOLUME SET WILL REQUIRE EXTRA SHIPPING. Please contact bookseller for details concerning shipping costs. The University of Chicago Press and Johnson Reprint Company. paperback
1946réf. ZB644052Oxford University Press 1946. Price HAS BEEN REDUCED by 10% until Monday Nov. 2 weekend sale item Volumes 1-33 partly bound minor library markings else text clean & bindings tight. - If you are reading this this item is actually physically in our stock and ready for shipment once ordered. We are not bookjackers. Buyer is responsible for any additional duties taxes or fees required by recipient's country. Photos available upon request. Oxford University Press unknown
1938réf. 062639London: Jonathan Cape 1938. Book. Fine. Hardcover. Signed by Publisher. 1st Edition. 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall. Two sumptuously bound volumes of the David Garnett edition of the "Letters of T.E. Lawrence" specially bound for the partners in the Jonathan Cape company. Probably the only two so bound in fine near identical half leather bindings Jonathan Cape's copy in scarlet leather and Wren Howard's in brown leather. Cape's copy is signed by Jonathan Cape and Wren Howard has a note from his widow giving provenance to the copy laid in. Both volumes in fine condition. These two copies surely deserve to be kept together to mark the triumvirate that meant so much to this publishing House Jonathan Cape the eponymous partner Wren Howard and of course T.E. Lawrence to whom much of the early success of the company rested. Still the most important collection of T.E. Lawrence correspondence. O'Brien A202. Remains one of the best sources for information on T.E. and his life. 896pp each volume. Jonathan Cape Hardcover
réf. 29574HB NODJ 1973 STATED 1ST PUBLISHED this EDITION THUS LIMITED EDITION #77/300 COPIES NEAR FINE SLIPCASE BLUE LEATHER CVR WITH CHRISTOPHER ROBIN & WINNIE THE POOH IN GOLD GILT Blue leather bound with gilt stamp to front cover and gilt lettering & RAISED BANDS along spine which shows light sunning otherwise in Near Fine condition. goldGilt page edges. In original BLUE Slipcase which is in Very Good condition shows light shelf wear and rubbing to edges .NO JACKET. Methuen Children’s Books ( LONDON PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN hardcover